Comparative Study of Different Gases for Packed-Bed Thermal Energy Storage Systems

In recent years, packed-bed systems for large-scale applications have emerged as a highly promising design for Thermal Energy Storage systems because of their high thermal efficiency and economic feasibility. Large-scale application systems typically include packed-bed thermal energy stores as essential components, enabling effective integration with renewable energy and processed heat. The packed-bed systems investigated in this paper utilise Magnesia as the storage medium and optimised parameters, which have previously been identified through research involving charging and discharging cycles of both the hot and cold storage systems when air is the heat transfer fluid. This includes solid particle diameters of 0.004 m, a material porosity of 0.2, an aspect ratio of 1 for the storage tank, and a mass flow rate of 13.7 kg/m3. This paper aims to present a comparative analysis of the influence of alternative heat transfer gases, namely air, argon, carbon dioxide, helium, hydrogen, and nitrogen, on the performance of Pumped Thermal Energy Storage hot and cold storage systems. The performance of the six gases in the storage system was evaluated using an axisymmetric model simulated with COMSOL Multiphysics 5.6 software, with the total energy stored and the capacity factor serving as key performance indicators. The results revealed that carbon dioxide gas was the most promising heat transfer fluid and that the packed bed could be operated efficiently over 72% and 76% of its range for hot and cold systems, respectively. Hydrogen, nitrogen, and air performed similarly but less adequately than carbon dioxide and had operating ranges of 55% and 75% for hot and cold storage. Helium and argon had the poorest performance, with optimal charging and discharging rates corresponding to 50% and 66%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18051307
Primary Topic
Phase Change Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Different Gases for Packed-Bed Thermal Energy Storage Systems

Ayah Marwan Rabi’, Jovana Radulović, James M. Buick
Energies
Phase Change Materials Research
article

Comparative Study of Different Gases for Packed-Bed Thermal Energy Storage Systems

Ayah Marwan Rabi’, Jovana Radulović, James M. Buick
article en

Abstract

In recent years, packed-bed systems for large-scale applications have emerged as a highly promising design for Thermal Energy Storage systems because of their high thermal efficiency and economic feasibility. Large-scale application systems typically include packed-bed thermal energy stores as essential components, enabling effective integration with renewable energy and processed heat. The packed-bed systems investigated in this paper utilise Magnesia as the storage medium and optimised parameters, which have previously been identified through research involving charging and discharging cycles of both the hot and cold storage systems when air is the heat transfer fluid. This includes solid particle diameters of 0.004 m, a material porosity of 0.2, an aspect ratio of 1 for the storage tank, and a mass flow rate of 13.7 kg/m3. This paper aims to present a comparative analysis of the influence of alternative heat transfer gases, namely air, argon, carbon dioxide, helium, hydrogen, and nitrogen, on the performance of Pumped Thermal Energy Storage hot and cold storage systems. The performance of the six gases in the storage system was evaluated using an axisymmetric model simulated with COMSOL Multiphysics 5.6 software, with the total energy stored and the capacity factor serving as key performance indicators. The results revealed that carbon dioxide gas was the most promising heat transfer fluid and that the packed bed could be operated efficiently over 72% and 76% of its range for hot and cold systems, respectively. Hydrogen, nitrogen, and air performed similarly but less adequately than carbon dioxide and had operating ranges of 55% and 75% for hot and cold storage. Helium and argon had the poorest performance, with optimal charging and discharging rates corresponding to 50% and 66%.

EnergiesVol. 18(5)
University of Portsmouth (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Phase Change Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Study of Different Gases for Packed-Bed Thermal Energy Storage Systems — Ayah Marwan Rabi’, Jovana Radulović, et al. · Energies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS