Supervision of team coaches: In need of a new method.

Team coaching is a relatively new and emerging field, with always evolving ideas around what it is and how it differs from team facilitation and development (Hackman & Wageman, 2005). Team-coaching programs are in many ways still in their infancy, with different curricula being developed across different institutions and training providers, however with an overall agreement that they need to differ from the training of individual coaches. After all, individual coaching is about individual learning and development and the psychology of the dyad, while team coaching is about team reflection, team development, and group dynamics, which can be very different from dynamics in a dyad. But what about the supervision of team coaches? What do current supervision models have to offer team coaches and their practice? Over the last 9 years, we have been experimenting, in the context of a team-coaching program, with a new group supervision method that specifically benefits team coaches and consultants who work regularly with intact teams. In this article, we want to initially share some thoughts on the role of the parallel process in supervision and how it has shaped our approach to team-coaching supervision.We will then describe our method, looking at the impact we have noticed and exploring the benefits and drawbacks of using it in an open or closed supervision group. Some reflections on the role of the supervisor will be offered, and we will conclude with some thoughts on the implications for supervision.What’s It Mean? Implications for Consulting Psychology It is important that coaching or consulting with an intact team is recognized as separate as compared with individual or group coaching with its own phenomena, methodology, and standards. This article shows that group supervision of team coaches needs to adapt to the specificities of team coaching, to create the right circumstances for learning and quality review. Thismeans allowing relevant (team) parallel processes to emerge during the supervision session.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Consulting psychology journal
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000291
Primary Topic
Coaching Methods and Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supervision of team coaches: In need of a new method.

Erik de Haan, Dorothee Stoffels
Consulting psychology journal
Coaching Methods and Impact
article

Supervision of team coaches: In need of a new method.

Erik de Haan, Dorothee Stoffels
article en

Abstract

Team coaching is a relatively new and emerging field, with always evolving ideas around what it is and how it differs from team facilitation and development (Hackman & Wageman, 2005). Team-coaching programs are in many ways still in their infancy, with different curricula being developed across different institutions and training providers, however with an overall agreement that they need to differ from the training of individual coaches. After all, individual coaching is about individual learning and development and the psychology of the dyad, while team coaching is about team reflection, team development, and group dynamics, which can be very different from dynamics in a dyad. But what about the supervision of team coaches? What do current supervision models have to offer team coaches and their practice? Over the last 9 years, we have been experimenting, in the context of a team-coaching program, with a new group supervision method that specifically benefits team coaches and consultants who work regularly with intact teams. In this article, we want to initially share some thoughts on the role of the parallel process in supervision and how it has shaped our approach to team-coaching supervision.We will then describe our method, looking at the impact we have noticed and exploring the benefits and drawbacks of using it in an open or closed supervision group. Some reflections on the role of the supervisor will be offered, and we will conclude with some thoughts on the implications for supervision.What’s It Mean? Implications for Consulting Psychology It is important that coaching or consulting with an intact team is recognized as separate as compared with individual or group coaching with its own phenomena, methodology, and standards. This article shows that group supervision of team coaches needs to adapt to the specificities of team coaching, to create the right circumstances for learning and quality review. Thismeans allowing relevant (team) parallel processes to emerge during the supervision session.

Consulting psychology journalVol. 77(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Coaching Methods and Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.