Turbulence Observations below Drifting Sea Ice: TKE Production and Dissipation in the Meltwater-Influenced Boundary Layer

Abstract During Arctic summer, meltwater inputs and a fragmented ice cover impede quantifying the role of boundary stress for turbulent mixing in the ice–ocean boundary layer. Here, we show that less than two-thirds of the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) generated from mean flow shear under drifting sea ice is dissipated, and the remainder can be attributed to balancing stabilizing buoyancy fluxes. We deployed a high-resolution acoustic Doppler current profiler under an ice floe to estimate Reynolds stress, shear production, and dissipation rate of TKE. At 0.75 m below the interface, dissipation rates from 1.5 × 10 −9 to 4.2 × 10 −7 m 2 s −3 and shear production from 6.9 × 10 −10 to 7.7 × 10 −7 m 2 s −3 were measured (5%–95% percentiles), with shear production exceeding dissipation on average. The turbulent stress was largest during an event with ∼9.2-h-period oscillations in the upper ocean, consistent with tidally forced lee waves generated near steep topography. An overall estimate of the quadratic skin drag coefficient representative of the ice floe is . We further identified three qualitative regimes of atmosphere–ice–ocean coupling in our observations: a high-frequency range [>4 cycles per day (cpd)] in which the ice acts like a rigid lid atop the ocean, an intermediate range, and a low-frequency range (<0.8 cpd), where wind-driven ice drift determines the under-ice current. As the latter only contained half of the variance of the ice-relative flow, we emphasize that resolving subdaily time scales is crucial in observing and modeling atmosphere–ice–ocean coupling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physical Oceanography
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo-d-24-0102.1
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.90
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turbulence Observations below Drifting Sea Ice: TKE Production and Dissipation in the Meltwater-Influenced Boundary Layer

Mara Neudert, Andreas Preußer, Torsten Kanzow, Ilker Fer et al.
3 citations
Journal of Physical Oceanography
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
3.90
article

Turbulence Observations below Drifting Sea Ice: TKE Production and Dissipation in the Meltwater-Influenced Boundary Layer

Mara Neudert, Andreas Preußer, Torsten Kanzow, Ilker Fer, Simon F. Reifenberg, Mario Hoppmann, Thomas Krumpen, Wilken‐Jon von Appen, Christian Haas
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract During Arctic summer, meltwater inputs and a fragmented ice cover impede quantifying the role of boundary stress for turbulent mixing in the ice–ocean boundary layer. Here, we show that less than two-thirds of the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) generated from mean flow shear under drifting sea ice is dissipated, and the remainder can be attributed to balancing stabilizing buoyancy fluxes. We deployed a high-resolution acoustic Doppler current profiler under an ice floe to estimate Reynolds stress, shear production, and dissipation rate of TKE. At 0.75 m below the interface, dissipation rates from 1.5 × 10 −9 to 4.2 × 10 −7 m 2 s −3 and shear production from 6.9 × 10 −10 to 7.7 × 10 −7 m 2 s −3 were measured (5%–95% percentiles), with shear production exceeding dissipation on average. The turbulent stress was largest during an event with ∼9.2-h-period oscillations in the upper ocean, consistent with tidally forced lee waves generated near steep topography. An overall estimate of the quadratic skin drag coefficient representative of the ice floe is . We further identified three qualitative regimes of atmosphere–ice–ocean coupling in our observations: a high-frequency range [>4 cycles per day (cpd)] in which the ice acts like a rigid lid atop the ocean, an intermediate range, and a low-frequency range (<0.8 cpd), where wind-driven ice drift determines the under-ice current. As the latter only contained half of the variance of the ice-relative flow, we emphasize that resolving subdaily time scales is crucial in observing and modeling atmosphere–ice–ocean coupling.

Journal of Physical OceanographyVol. 55(4)
Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (DE), University of Bremen (DE), Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research (NO), University of Bergen (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
3.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.