Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Anastomoses of the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Multicentric Experience

This multicenter retrospective study included patients undergoing EUS-guided GI anastomoses from 2016 to 2023. Indications for EUS-guided anastomosis were GOO, ALS or patients with altered anatomy needing endoscopic interventions. The primary outcome was technical success, while secondary outcomes included clinical success, safety, lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) patency, and the need for reinterventions. A total of 216 patients (mean age 64.5 [±13.94] years; 49.1% males) were included. In total, 149 cases (69%) were GOO, 44 (20.4%) cases were bilioenteric anastomotic strictures or lithiasis in altered anatomy, 14 cases (6.5%) were ALS, and 9 patients (4.2%) were for ERCP in altered anatomy after EUS-GG. Overall, EUS-GE was performed in 181 patients (83.8%), EUS-JJ in 44 cases (20.4%), and EUS-GG in 10 (4.6%). Technical success was 94.91%, and clinical success was 93.66%. The adverse event (AE) rate was 11.1%. The reintervention rate was 7.69%. The median follow-up was 85 days. In conclusions, EUS-guided GI anastomoses are technically feasible and safe in both malignant and benign diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17050910
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Esophageal and GI Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Anastomoses of the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Multicentric Experience

Edoardo Forti, Stefano Francesco Crinò, Alessandro Fugazza, Cecilia Binda et al.
6 citations
Cancers
Esophageal and GI Pathology
12.04
article

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Anastomoses of the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Multicentric Experience

Edoardo Forti, Stefano Francesco Crinò, Alessandro Fugazza, Cecilia Binda, Alessandro Repici, Marcello Fabio Maida, Giovanni Aragona, Andrea A. Anderloni, Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo, Carlo Fabbri, Chiara Coluccio, Giuseppe Vanella, Ilaria Tarantino, Aurelio Mauro, Andrea Lisotti, Francesco Maria Di Matteo
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This multicenter retrospective study included patients undergoing EUS-guided GI anastomoses from 2016 to 2023. Indications for EUS-guided anastomosis were GOO, ALS or patients with altered anatomy needing endoscopic interventions. The primary outcome was technical success, while secondary outcomes included clinical success, safety, lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) patency, and the need for reinterventions. A total of 216 patients (mean age 64.5 [±13.94] years; 49.1% males) were included. In total, 149 cases (69%) were GOO, 44 (20.4%) cases were bilioenteric anastomotic strictures or lithiasis in altered anatomy, 14 cases (6.5%) were ALS, and 9 patients (4.2%) were for ERCP in altered anatomy after EUS-GG. Overall, EUS-GE was performed in 181 patients (83.8%), EUS-JJ in 44 cases (20.4%), and EUS-GG in 10 (4.6%). Technical success was 94.91%, and clinical success was 93.66%. The adverse event (AE) rate was 11.1%. The reintervention rate was 7.69%. The median follow-up was 85 days. In conclusions, EUS-guided GI anastomoses are technically feasible and safe in both malignant and benign diseases.

CancersVol. 17(5)
Humanitas University (IT), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT), Università degli Studi di Enna Kore (IT), University of Pavia (IT), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (IT), Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Piacenza (IT), Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna (IT), Campus Bio Medico University Hospital (IT), Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele (IT), Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione (IT), University of Palermo (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Esophageal and GI Pathology
12.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.