Contrasting a BYD Blade prismatic cell and Tesla 4680 cylindrical cell with a teardown analysis of design and performance

In order to provide design guidance for the development of next-generation batteries, this article presents a teardown analysis of two commercial lithium-ion batteries: the Tesla 4680 cell and the BYD Blade cell. Insights into these cells' electrical, mechanical, material, and process designs are provided. The BYD Blade cell displays half the energy losses per volume of the Tesla 4680 cell at the same C-rate. The Tesla 4680 cell utilizes laser welding, and the BYD Blade cell utilizes laser and ultrasonic welding as electrode contacting technologies. Lithium iron phosphate (LFP; BYD Blade cell) and NMC811 (Tesla 4680 cell) are confirmed as electrode materials resulting in energy densities of 160 Wh/kg and 355.26 Wh/l and 241.01 Wh/kg and 643.3 Wh/l, respectively, on the cell level. Both cells utilize graphite anodes without silicon dioxide. Polyacrylic acid (PAA) and polyethylene oxide (PEO) are detected as binders on the anode side for the Tesla 4680 cell. A manufacturing sequence is proposed for both cells.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Reports Physical Science
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.102453
Citations
34
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
23.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrasting a BYD Blade prismatic cell and Tesla 4680 cylindrical cell with a teardown analysis of design and performance

Moritz Frieges, Heiner Hans Heimes, Domenic Klohs, Achim Kampker et al.
34 citations
Cell Reports Physical Science
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
23.22
article

Contrasting a BYD Blade prismatic cell and Tesla 4680 cylindrical cell with a teardown analysis of design and performance

Moritz Frieges, Heiner Hans Heimes, Domenic Klohs, Achim Kampker, Niklas Kisseler, Jonas Gorsch, Julius Schneiders, Marina Muñoz Castro, Eleonore Siebecke
article en
34 citations

Abstract

In order to provide design guidance for the development of next-generation batteries, this article presents a teardown analysis of two commercial lithium-ion batteries: the Tesla 4680 cell and the BYD Blade cell. Insights into these cells' electrical, mechanical, material, and process designs are provided. The BYD Blade cell displays half the energy losses per volume of the Tesla 4680 cell at the same C-rate. The Tesla 4680 cell utilizes laser welding, and the BYD Blade cell utilizes laser and ultrasonic welding as electrode contacting technologies. Lithium iron phosphate (LFP; BYD Blade cell) and NMC811 (Tesla 4680 cell) are confirmed as electrode materials resulting in energy densities of 160 Wh/kg and 355.26 Wh/l and 241.01 Wh/kg and 643.3 Wh/l, respectively, on the cell level. Both cells utilize graphite anodes without silicon dioxide. Polyacrylic acid (PAA) and polyethylene oxide (PEO) are detected as binders on the anode side for the Tesla 4680 cell. A manufacturing sequence is proposed for both cells.

Cell Reports Physical ScienceVol. 6(3)
University of Münster (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Ceramic Technologies and Systems (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
23.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Contrasting a BYD Blade prismatic cell and Tesla 4680 cylindrical cell with a teardown analysis of design and performance — Moritz Frieges, Heiner Hans Heimes, et al. · Cell Reports Physical Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS