Passenger physiology in self-driving vehicles during unexpected events

While using fully autonomous vehicles is expected to radically change the way we live our daily lives, it is not yet available in most parts of the world, so we only have sporadic results on passenger reactions. Furthermore, we have very limited insights into how passengers react to an unexpected event during the ride. Previous physiological research has shown that passengers have lower levels of anxiety in the event of a human-driven condition compared to a self-driving condition. The aim of our current study was to investigate these differences in unexpected road events in real-life passenger experiences. All subjects were driven through a closed test track in human-driven and then self-driving mode. During the journey, unforeseen obstacles were encountered on the path (deer and human-shaped dummies appeared). Using physiological measurements (EEG, eye movements, head movements and blinking frequencies) our results suggest that passengers had moderate affective preferences for human-driven conditions. Furthermore, multifractal spectra of eye movements and head movements were wider and blinking frequencies were decreased during unexpected events. Our findings further establish real-world physiological measurements as a source of information in researching the acceptance and usage of self-driving technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81960-4
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Passenger physiology in self-driving vehicles during unexpected events

Márta Volosin, Zsolt Palatinus, Zoltán Majó-Petri, Miklós Lukovics et al.
5 citations
Scientific Reports
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
9.68
article

Passenger physiology in self-driving vehicles during unexpected events

Márta Volosin, Zsolt Palatinus, Zoltán Majó-Petri, Miklós Lukovics, Szabolcs Prónay, Henrietta Lengyel, Zsolt Szalay, Zsolt Dudás
article en
5 citations

Abstract

While using fully autonomous vehicles is expected to radically change the way we live our daily lives, it is not yet available in most parts of the world, so we only have sporadic results on passenger reactions. Furthermore, we have very limited insights into how passengers react to an unexpected event during the ride. Previous physiological research has shown that passengers have lower levels of anxiety in the event of a human-driven condition compared to a self-driving condition. The aim of our current study was to investigate these differences in unexpected road events in real-life passenger experiences. All subjects were driven through a closed test track in human-driven and then self-driving mode. During the journey, unforeseen obstacles were encountered on the path (deer and human-shaped dummies appeared). Using physiological measurements (EEG, eye movements, head movements and blinking frequencies) our results suggest that passengers had moderate affective preferences for human-driven conditions. Furthermore, multifractal spectra of eye movements and head movements were wider and blinking frequencies were decreased during unexpected events. Our findings further establish real-world physiological measurements as a source of information in researching the acceptance and usage of self-driving technologies.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Szeged (HU), Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU), HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences (HU)
Hungarian Scientific Research Fund, Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal, National Research, Development and Innovation Office
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
9.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.