Speed–Pressure Compound Control of Thrust System Based on the Adaptive Sliding Mode Control Strategy

The thrust system, an important subsystem of a tunnel boring machine (TBM), primarily provides thrust force and adjusts TBM’s attitude in real time. In the tunneling process, only controlling the thrust speed causes pressure oscillations, increases soil deformation, and leads to surface subsidence or upheaval. Conversely, solely relying on pressure control causes fluctuations in speed, making it difficult to ensure that the deviation between the designed tunneling axis (DTA) and the actual tunneling axis (ATA) remains within the permissible range. Due to the increase in geological complexity and higher construction quality standards, primarily relying on single-mode speed or pressure control has become inadequate to meet operational demands. Therefore, to realize higher safety and precise trajectory tracking, it is necessary to ensure speed and pressure compound control for thrust systems. This paper proposes a novel adaptive sliding mode control (ASMC) strategy for thrust systems, which is composed of a proportional pressure relief valve (PPRV) and a proportional flow control valve (PFCV). Firstly, PPRV and PFCV are modeled as a second-order system and an ASMC is employed to control the pressure and speed. Next, to assess the performance of the ASMC controller, simulation experiments were conducted under various conditions, including speed regulation, sudden changed load, and disturbed load. The simulation results indicate that compared to the Proportion–Integral–Differential (PID) controller, the ASMC controller shows almost no overshoot in speed and pressure control during the initial stages, with the response time reduced by approximately 70%. During speed regulation process and sudden changed load process, the response time for both speed and pressure control is shortened by about 80%. In the disturbed load process, the ASMC controller maintains pressure stability. In conclusion, the ASMC controller significantly improves the response speed and stability of the thrust system, exhibiting better control performance under various operating conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machines
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13030213
Primary Topic
Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Speed–Pressure Compound Control of Thrust System Based on the Adaptive Sliding Mode Control Strategy

T. Y. Xing, Huayong Yang, Zhe Zheng, Lijie Jiang et al.
Machines
Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
article

Speed–Pressure Compound Control of Thrust System Based on the Adaptive Sliding Mode Control Strategy

T. Y. Xing, Huayong Yang, Zhe Zheng, Lijie Jiang, Liu Hong, Dong Han, Guofang Gong, Lianhui Jia
article en

Abstract

The thrust system, an important subsystem of a tunnel boring machine (TBM), primarily provides thrust force and adjusts TBM’s attitude in real time. In the tunneling process, only controlling the thrust speed causes pressure oscillations, increases soil deformation, and leads to surface subsidence or upheaval. Conversely, solely relying on pressure control causes fluctuations in speed, making it difficult to ensure that the deviation between the designed tunneling axis (DTA) and the actual tunneling axis (ATA) remains within the permissible range. Due to the increase in geological complexity and higher construction quality standards, primarily relying on single-mode speed or pressure control has become inadequate to meet operational demands. Therefore, to realize higher safety and precise trajectory tracking, it is necessary to ensure speed and pressure compound control for thrust systems. This paper proposes a novel adaptive sliding mode control (ASMC) strategy for thrust systems, which is composed of a proportional pressure relief valve (PPRV) and a proportional flow control valve (PFCV). Firstly, PPRV and PFCV are modeled as a second-order system and an ASMC is employed to control the pressure and speed. Next, to assess the performance of the ASMC controller, simulation experiments were conducted under various conditions, including speed regulation, sudden changed load, and disturbed load. The simulation results indicate that compared to the Proportion–Integral–Differential (PID) controller, the ASMC controller shows almost no overshoot in speed and pressure control during the initial stages, with the response time reduced by approximately 70%. During speed regulation process and sudden changed load process, the response time for both speed and pressure control is shortened by about 80%. In the disturbed load process, the ASMC controller maintains pressure stability. In conclusion, the ASMC controller significantly improves the response speed and stability of the thrust system, exhibiting better control performance under various operating conditions.

MachinesVol. 13(3)
China Railway Group (China) (CN), Zhejiang University of Technology (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.