The continued evolution of the diagnosis of Personality Disorders

This paper traces the evolution of the diagnostic formulations for personality disorders (PDs) through the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5-TR; American Psychiatric Association, 2022) and in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11; World Health Organization, 2019). It outlines key arguments for and against three major diagnostic approaches: the categorical approach that is currently in use in the DSM-5-TR, which lists ten categories of PDs; the dimensional model, which diagnoses PDs according to five domains, their respective facets, and their severity; and the mixed/hybrid approach in Section III of the DSM-5-TR, which has been proposed as an Alternative Model of Personality Disorder (AMPD) diagnosis. Finally, three case studies are compared and contrasted using all three approaches. All three diagnostic systems appear to have advantages and disadvantages, although the dimensional and mixed/hybrid seem to be gaining adherents, particularly among younger mental health professionals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Personality Psychology
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21827/ijpp.11.42317
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The continued evolution of the diagnosis of Personality Disorders

Dhwani P. Sadaphal, Daniel L. Segal, Frederick L. Coolidge, Apeksha Srivastava
1 citations
International Journal of Personality Psychology
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
2.31
article

The continued evolution of the diagnosis of Personality Disorders

Dhwani P. Sadaphal, Daniel L. Segal, Frederick L. Coolidge, Apeksha Srivastava
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper traces the evolution of the diagnostic formulations for personality disorders (PDs) through the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5-TR; American Psychiatric Association, 2022) and in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11; World Health Organization, 2019). It outlines key arguments for and against three major diagnostic approaches: the categorical approach that is currently in use in the DSM-5-TR, which lists ten categories of PDs; the dimensional model, which diagnoses PDs according to five domains, their respective facets, and their severity; and the mixed/hybrid approach in Section III of the DSM-5-TR, which has been proposed as an Alternative Model of Personality Disorder (AMPD) diagnosis. Finally, three case studies are compared and contrasted using all three approaches. All three diagnostic systems appear to have advantages and disadvantages, although the dimensional and mixed/hybrid seem to be gaining adherents, particularly among younger mental health professionals.

International Journal of Personality PsychologyVol. 11
University of Vienna (AT), Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar (IN), University of Colorado System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The continued evolution of the diagnosis of Personality Disorders — Dhwani P. Sadaphal, Daniel L. Segal, et al. · International Journal of Personality Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS