Evaluating the performance of four types of photovoltaic panels in Antarctica's extreme environment

This study experimentally evaluated the performance of four different photovoltaic (PV) systems on Horseshoe Island in Antarctica. The experiment, conducted near the Turkish Scientific Research Camp, examined the efficiencies of monocrystalline, polycrystalline, flexible, and transparent PV panels under summer conditions, while real-time meteorological data such as solar radiation, temperature, humidity, and wind speed were recorded. The power output and surface temperatures of the panels were analyzed, and energy and exergy efficiencies were calculated, along with assessments of environmental impact factors, the exergy sustainability index, and environmental-economic analyses. The power outputs obtained from the experiments were recorded as 14.2W, 13.0W, 12.9W, and 9.2W for monocrystalline, polycrystalline, flexible, and transparentpanels, respectively. The average surface temperatures were determined as 18.3°C for monocrystalline, 18.2°C for polycrystalline, 17.6°C for flexible, and 16.5°C for transparant panels. The highest energy efficiency was observed in the monocrystalline PV panel at 29.1%, while the efficiencies of the other panels were calculated as 27.0%, 27.5%, and 21.5%, with exergy efficiencies measured at 8.66%, 8.39%, 7.37%, and 6.70%, respectively. In the environmental analyses, the annual CO 2 emission reduction was calculated, with the monocrystalline PV panel providing the highest savings at 4.1 tons. From an economic perspective, the monocrystalline PV panel was also found to be the most advantageous, with a cost of $59. Antarctica, Horseshoe, solar panel, enegy-exergy, renewable energy

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2025.106007
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the performance of four types of photovoltaic panels in Antarctica's extreme environment

Mehmet Daş, Burcu Özsoy, Ebru Kavak Akpınar, Doğaç Baybars ISILER et al.
4 citations
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
3.20
article

Evaluating the performance of four types of photovoltaic panels in Antarctica's extreme environment

Mehmet Daş, Burcu Özsoy, Ebru Kavak Akpınar, Doğaç Baybars ISILER, Erhan Arslan
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study experimentally evaluated the performance of four different photovoltaic (PV) systems on Horseshoe Island in Antarctica. The experiment, conducted near the Turkish Scientific Research Camp, examined the efficiencies of monocrystalline, polycrystalline, flexible, and transparent PV panels under summer conditions, while real-time meteorological data such as solar radiation, temperature, humidity, and wind speed were recorded. The power output and surface temperatures of the panels were analyzed, and energy and exergy efficiencies were calculated, along with assessments of environmental impact factors, the exergy sustainability index, and environmental-economic analyses. The power outputs obtained from the experiments were recorded as 14.2W, 13.0W, 12.9W, and 9.2W for monocrystalline, polycrystalline, flexible, and transparentpanels, respectively. The average surface temperatures were determined as 18.3°C for monocrystalline, 18.2°C for polycrystalline, 17.6°C for flexible, and 16.5°C for transparant panels. The highest energy efficiency was observed in the monocrystalline PV panel at 29.1%, while the efficiencies of the other panels were calculated as 27.0%, 27.5%, and 21.5%, with exergy efficiencies measured at 8.66%, 8.39%, 7.37%, and 6.70%, respectively. In the environmental analyses, the annual CO 2 emission reduction was calculated, with the monocrystalline PV panel providing the highest savings at 4.1 tons. From an economic perspective, the monocrystalline PV panel was also found to be the most advantageous, with a cost of $59. Antarctica, Horseshoe, solar panel, enegy-exergy, renewable energy

Case Studies in Thermal EngineeringVol. 69
Fırat University (TR), Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu (TR), TÜBİTAK Marmara Research Center (TR), Istanbul Technical University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
3.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.