Effect of Bioactive Adhesives on Shear Bond Strength at the Enamel-Orthodontic Bracket Interface

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the bonding effectiveness of bioactive restorative materials when used for orthodontic bracket placement. Specifically, it evaluated whether these materials could provide shear bond strength (SBS) comparable to that of conventional resin-based adhesives, while also minimizing residual adhesive and preserving enamel integrity after bracket debonding. Methods: Forty-five extracted, caries-free premolars were randomly assigned into three main groups (n=15) based on the restorative material used: ACTIVA Bioactive-Restorative (AB), Beautifil II (BF), and Transbond XT (TB XT) — with TB XT serving as the control. Each group was further subdivided into three adhesive primer subgroups (n=5): FL-Bond II, BeautiBond Xtreme, and Transbond XT Primer. After standardized enamel cleaning and etching procedures, orthodontic metal brackets were bonded to the tooth surfaces and light-cured as per manufacturer guidelines. Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours before being subjected to shear bond strength testing using a universal testing machine. Following debonding, residual adhesive was evaluated under a stereomicroscope and scored using the modified Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). Results: Two-way ANOVA revealed a statistically significant interaction between the type of adhesive and restorative material on SBS values (p<0.001). Among all combinations, the group using FL-Bond II with Transbond XT exhibited the highest mean SBS (19.44±3.90 MPa), while the Beautifil II group paired with BeautiBond Xtreme showed the lowest bond strength. ARI score analysis demonstrated significant differences across groups, with FL-Bond II generally resulting in minimal adhesive remnants on the enamel surface. Conclusion: The combination of FL-Bond II adhesive with conventional Transbond XT composite resin exhibited superior shear bond strength and favorable ARI scores, making it an optimal choice for orthodontic bracket bonding. ACTIVA Bioactive, when used with suitable primers, demonstrated promising results in terms of bond strength and enamel preservation, indicating its potential as an alternative to conventional systems. However, further in vivo and long-term clinical studies are warranted to validate these findings under dynamic oral conditions.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pioneering Medical Science
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47310/jpms2025140205
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Bioactive Adhesives on Shear Bond Strength at the Enamel-Orthodontic Bracket Interface

1 citations
Journal of Pioneering Medical Science
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
2.31
article

Effect of Bioactive Adhesives on Shear Bond Strength at the Enamel-Orthodontic Bracket Interface

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the bonding effectiveness of bioactive restorative materials when used for orthodontic bracket placement. Specifically, it evaluated whether these materials could provide shear bond strength (SBS) comparable to that of conventional resin-based adhesives, while also minimizing residual adhesive and preserving enamel integrity after bracket debonding. Methods: Forty-five extracted, caries-free premolars were randomly assigned into three main groups (n=15) based on the restorative material used: ACTIVA Bioactive-Restorative (AB), Beautifil II (BF), and Transbond XT (TB XT) — with TB XT serving as the control. Each group was further subdivided into three adhesive primer subgroups (n=5): FL-Bond II, BeautiBond Xtreme, and Transbond XT Primer. After standardized enamel cleaning and etching procedures, orthodontic metal brackets were bonded to the tooth surfaces and light-cured as per manufacturer guidelines. Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours before being subjected to shear bond strength testing using a universal testing machine. Following debonding, residual adhesive was evaluated under a stereomicroscope and scored using the modified Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). Results: Two-way ANOVA revealed a statistically significant interaction between the type of adhesive and restorative material on SBS values (p<0.001). Among all combinations, the group using FL-Bond II with Transbond XT exhibited the highest mean SBS (19.44±3.90 MPa), while the Beautifil II group paired with BeautiBond Xtreme showed the lowest bond strength. ARI score analysis demonstrated significant differences across groups, with FL-Bond II generally resulting in minimal adhesive remnants on the enamel surface. Conclusion: The combination of FL-Bond II adhesive with conventional Transbond XT composite resin exhibited superior shear bond strength and favorable ARI scores, making it an optimal choice for orthodontic bracket bonding. ACTIVA Bioactive, when used with suitable primers, demonstrated promising results in terms of bond strength and enamel preservation, indicating its potential as an alternative to conventional systems. However, further in vivo and long-term clinical studies are warranted to validate these findings under dynamic oral conditions.

Journal of Pioneering Medical ScienceVol. 14(Special Issue 1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effect of Bioactive Adhesives on Shear Bond Strength at the Enamel-Orthodontic Bracket Interface · Journal of Pioneering Medical Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS