Evaluating the Evaluations: A Perspective on Benchmarks

More and more benchmarks, datasets, and evaluation tasks are becoming available. This is extremely useful for the community because it enables researchers and practitioners to test and evaluate new techniques. However, the construction, evaluation, and maintenance of data sets and benchmarks is opaque which creates problems with respect to stability and true representations. Our position is that we need to revisit how we design and implement benchmarks. The SPEC benchmark offers interesting perspectives that our community should consider. We use a data set of influential papers and resources to discuss important benchmark aspects such as realistic workloads, reliability, validity, leakage, and labeling. We conclude by proposing a list of principles for constructing evaluation benchmarks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM SIGIR Forum
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3722449.3722467
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Evaluations: A Perspective on Benchmarks

Kenneth Church, Omar Alonso
ACM SIGIR Forum
Topic Modeling
article

Evaluating the Evaluations: A Perspective on Benchmarks

Kenneth Church, Omar Alonso
article en

Abstract

More and more benchmarks, datasets, and evaluation tasks are becoming available. This is extremely useful for the community because it enables researchers and practitioners to test and evaluate new techniques. However, the construction, evaluation, and maintenance of data sets and benchmarks is opaque which creates problems with respect to stability and true representations. Our position is that we need to revisit how we design and implement benchmarks. The SPEC benchmark offers interesting perspectives that our community should consider. We use a data set of influential papers and resources to discuss important benchmark aspects such as realistic workloads, reliability, validity, leakage, and labeling. We conclude by proposing a list of principles for constructing evaluation benchmarks.

ACM SIGIR ForumVol. 58(2)
Northeastern University (US), Amazon (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.