Large Eddy Simulations of a High-Speed Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade at Subsonic and Transonic Mach Numbers

Abstract High-speed low-pressure turbines (HS-LPTs) are one key turbomachinery component in ultra-high bypass ratio geared turbofan engines. The HS-LPT typically operates at transonic exit Mach numbers and low-Reynolds numbers. These flow regimes are prone to boundary layer instabilities such as separations on the suction side, leading to a significant increase in losses. It is therefore essential to understand the operation of LPTs and, more specifically, the behavior of the boundary layer on the blades in such environments. We present a numerical investigation of a high-speed low-Reynolds turbine cascade simulated at nominal and off-design Mach numbers. The study case is the SPLEEN C1 cascade tested in the transonic linear cascade rig S-1/C of the von Karman Institute. The cascade is numerically operated at the nominal test exit Reynolds number Re2,is=70k, over a range of subsonic and transonic exit Mach numbers: M2,is=0.70,0.80,0.90, and 0.95. All simulations are performed with the explicit compressible solver of the massively parallel code YALES2, using a wall-resolved large eddy simulations (WRLES) approach, and featuring a fourth-order finite volume spatial discretization. This scale-resolving approach allows to capture the turbine flow physics with high accuracy at an acceptable computational cost. The test case offers the possibility to assess the Mach and compressibility effects on the profile aerodynamics of HS-LPT: separation, transition mechanisms, unsteadiness, and passage choking, as well as trailing edge unsteady flows. The flow predictions show a substantial agreement with the available high-fidelity experimental data. Furthermore, the calculations suggest that the wake thins and loss increase with the Mach number. The experiments support this evidence, although discrepancies are observed in peak losses for Mach numbers above 0.70. The root cause is likely found in the laminar inflow used in the large eddy simulations (LES) compared to the freestream turbulence intensity level of 2.5% of the experimental test case. Compressibility effects are observed. In particular, a weak compression wave stands in the region of the cascade throat for the case M2,is=0.90, whereas a shock appears for M2,is=0.95 with the cascade choked. The role of the shock on the separation and transition on the blade suction side is discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Turbomachinery
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068124
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large Eddy Simulations of a High-Speed Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade at Subsonic and Transonic Mach Numbers

Sergio Lavagnoli, Yacine Bechane, Laurent Bricteux, Patrick Tene Hedje
4 citations
Journal of Turbomachinery
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
19.97
article

Large Eddy Simulations of a High-Speed Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade at Subsonic and Transonic Mach Numbers

Sergio Lavagnoli, Yacine Bechane, Laurent Bricteux, Patrick Tene Hedje
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract High-speed low-pressure turbines (HS-LPTs) are one key turbomachinery component in ultra-high bypass ratio geared turbofan engines. The HS-LPT typically operates at transonic exit Mach numbers and low-Reynolds numbers. These flow regimes are prone to boundary layer instabilities such as separations on the suction side, leading to a significant increase in losses. It is therefore essential to understand the operation of LPTs and, more specifically, the behavior of the boundary layer on the blades in such environments. We present a numerical investigation of a high-speed low-Reynolds turbine cascade simulated at nominal and off-design Mach numbers. The study case is the SPLEEN C1 cascade tested in the transonic linear cascade rig S-1/C of the von Karman Institute. The cascade is numerically operated at the nominal test exit Reynolds number Re2,is=70k, over a range of subsonic and transonic exit Mach numbers: M2,is=0.70,0.80,0.90, and 0.95. All simulations are performed with the explicit compressible solver of the massively parallel code YALES2, using a wall-resolved large eddy simulations (WRLES) approach, and featuring a fourth-order finite volume spatial discretization. This scale-resolving approach allows to capture the turbine flow physics with high accuracy at an acceptable computational cost. The test case offers the possibility to assess the Mach and compressibility effects on the profile aerodynamics of HS-LPT: separation, transition mechanisms, unsteadiness, and passage choking, as well as trailing edge unsteady flows. The flow predictions show a substantial agreement with the available high-fidelity experimental data. Furthermore, the calculations suggest that the wake thins and loss increase with the Mach number. The experiments support this evidence, although discrepancies are observed in peak losses for Mach numbers above 0.70. The root cause is likely found in the laminar inflow used in the large eddy simulations (LES) compared to the freestream turbulence intensity level of 2.5% of the experimental test case. Compressibility effects are observed. In particular, a weak compression wave stands in the region of the cascade throat for the case M2,is=0.90, whereas a shock appears for M2,is=0.95 with the cascade choked. The role of the shock on the separation and transition on the blade suction side is discussed.

Journal of TurbomachineryVol. 147(10)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Mons (BE), Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics (BE), Normandie Université (FR), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées Rouen Normandie (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
19.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.