Evaluation of alignment methods to support the assessment of similarity between e-commerce knowledge graphs

Enterprise knowledge graphs combine data from multiple sources, and the structure and granularity of the resulting graphs can vary widely. The data in knowledge graphs is typically structured by schemas, mainly ontologies. Finding the alignments between content from different graphs allows to reduce redundancy, detect inconsistencies, and improve the use of the data. Recently, many graph alignment methods have been proposed, usually tested on general knowledge bases, so there is very little knowledge about the effectiveness of the methods in specific domains. Moreover, we are also interested in studying how these methods capture the semantic similarity between the schemas of the knowledge graphs. In this article, we study both aspects using 25 graph alignment methods on datasets related to e-commerce activities of organizations, such as product sales or customer satisfaction. We have developed a pipeline for generating and evaluating the results. The results show that the alignment methods can be used as a semantic similarity system between the ontology-dataset pairs that generate the knowledge graphs, that AttrE and BootEA are the most effective and robust methods across the different datasets, that the complexity of the structure of the ontology has a clear impact on the effectiveness of the methods, and that the results of the alignment experiments generate information about the similarity of the ontologies and reveal which parts of them should be better modeled to increase the performance of the methods. • Methodological framework for systematic analysis of entity alignment experiments. • Evaluation of 25 methods for supporting semantic similarity analysis. • AttrE and BootEA are the best performing methods based on standardized metrics. • The structure of the ontology influences the results of the graph alignment methods. • Not all class attributes or relations have equal influence on the alignment results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge-Based Systems
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113283
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Graph Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of alignment methods to support the assessment of similarity between e-commerce knowledge graphs

José Luis Sánchez-Fernández, P.R. Deshmukh, José Antonio Bernabé-Díaz, Paola Espinoza-Arias et al.
2 citations
Knowledge-Based Systems
Advanced Graph Neural Networks
4.96
article

Evaluation of alignment methods to support the assessment of similarity between e-commerce knowledge graphs

José Luis Sánchez-Fernández, P.R. Deshmukh, José Antonio Bernabé-Díaz, Paola Espinoza-Arias, Ginés Almagro-Hernández, Juan Mulero-Hernández, Jesualdo Tomás Fernández‐Breis, Juergen Mueller
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Enterprise knowledge graphs combine data from multiple sources, and the structure and granularity of the resulting graphs can vary widely. The data in knowledge graphs is typically structured by schemas, mainly ontologies. Finding the alignments between content from different graphs allows to reduce redundancy, detect inconsistencies, and improve the use of the data. Recently, many graph alignment methods have been proposed, usually tested on general knowledge bases, so there is very little knowledge about the effectiveness of the methods in specific domains. Moreover, we are also interested in studying how these methods capture the semantic similarity between the schemas of the knowledge graphs. In this article, we study both aspects using 25 graph alignment methods on datasets related to e-commerce activities of organizations, such as product sales or customer satisfaction. We have developed a pipeline for generating and evaluating the results. The results show that the alignment methods can be used as a semantic similarity system between the ontology-dataset pairs that generate the knowledge graphs, that AttrE and BootEA are the most effective and robust methods across the different datasets, that the complexity of the structure of the ontology has a clear impact on the effectiveness of the methods, and that the results of the alignment experiments generate information about the similarity of the ontologies and reveal which parts of them should be better modeled to increase the performance of the methods. • Methodological framework for systematic analysis of entity alignment experiments. • Evaluation of 25 methods for supporting semantic similarity analysis. • AttrE and BootEA are the best performing methods based on standardized metrics. • The structure of the ontology influences the results of the graph alignment methods. • Not all class attributes or relations have equal influence on the alignment results.

Knowledge-Based SystemsVol. 315
BASF (Germany) (DE), Universidad de Murcia (ES)
BASF
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advanced Graph Neural Networks
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.