Evaluating ecologically unequal exchange and comparative advantage in the transboundary trade of plastic waste

Trade in plastic waste is a global concern as it has a spillover effect on the environment and could represent unfair trade relations between developed countries and developing countries. Trading plastic waste is supposedly explained by the theory of comparative advantage, which considers opportunity costs. However, the theory of ecologically unequal exchange asserts that when environmental externalities are also taken into account, rich countries disproportionately benefit from exports, as poorer importing countries incur the costs of environmental degradation. Due to the paucity of available literature in this area, the present study uses concrete economic and environmental variables to test the validity of these theoretical claims. A gravity model with panel data for 178 countries from 2005 to 2021 was employed to analyse the trade flows and key determinants. The estimated results offer robust evidence indicating that trade in plastic waste is influenced by tariffs and non-tariff measures, including trade sanctions, biocapacity, and recycling rates by country. Considering the significant role played by differences in environmental indicators, the results support the relevance of the hypothesis of ecologically unequal exchange and the principle of comparative advantage in the trade of plastic waste.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2025.2474484
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating ecologically unequal exchange and comparative advantage in the transboundary trade of plastic waste

Song Soo Lim, Dae Eui Kim
Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

Evaluating ecologically unequal exchange and comparative advantage in the transboundary trade of plastic waste

Song Soo Lim, Dae Eui Kim
article en

Abstract

Trade in plastic waste is a global concern as it has a spillover effect on the environment and could represent unfair trade relations between developed countries and developing countries. Trading plastic waste is supposedly explained by the theory of comparative advantage, which considers opportunity costs. However, the theory of ecologically unequal exchange asserts that when environmental externalities are also taken into account, rich countries disproportionately benefit from exports, as poorer importing countries incur the costs of environmental degradation. Due to the paucity of available literature in this area, the present study uses concrete economic and environmental variables to test the validity of these theoretical claims. A gravity model with panel data for 178 countries from 2005 to 2021 was employed to analyse the trade flows and key determinants. The estimated results offer robust evidence indicating that trade in plastic waste is influenced by tariffs and non-tariff measures, including trade sanctions, biocapacity, and recycling rates by country. Considering the significant role played by differences in environmental indicators, the results support the relevance of the hypothesis of ecologically unequal exchange and the principle of comparative advantage in the trade of plastic waste.

Journal of Environmental Economics and PolicyVol. 14(2)
Korea University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.