Modelling exposure to aerosols from showers: Implications for microbial risk assessment

• Aerosol generation and size distribution differ between cold showers and hot showers. • Aerosol concentrations generated during hot showers peak in the first two minutes. • Ventilation is more influential on aerosol removal for cold showers than for hot showers. • Accounting for dynamism in aerosol generation rates influences exposure estimates. Inhalation of aerosols produced during showering exposes people to chemical and microbial contaminants present in the water. To improve quantitative estimates of exposure and to inform the efficacy of potential interventions to reduce exposures, the number and size distributions of aerosols generated during showering events were monitored and a mass balance model of the generated aerosols was developed. The aerosol generation rates were calculated through calibrating the model with the measured aerosol data. Specifically, aerosol count concentrations and size distributions were measured with an aerodynamic particle sizer over the duration of mock showering events under various conditions, including different water temperatures and different showerhead types (conventional and rain showers). The empirical data were then used to fit a mass balance model to obtain aerosol generation rates and decay rates for each aerosol size class through least square fitting. An initial high peak concentration of aerosols was observed under hot water conditions relative to cold water conditions which resulted in a rapid increase in aerosol exposure during the first 1-2 minutes of showering. This suggests that people showering in hot water conditions will have a potentially increased exposure during the first 1-2 minutes. The model-fitted values suggest large inter-experiment variation in estimated aerosol generation and decay rates, even among triplicates of the same showering conditions. Current exposure assessment approaches assume constant aerosol concentrations during showers which might lead to miscalculated cumulative risk for microbial hazards because of their uneven distribution in building plumbing systems and biofilm detachment process during flushing. Thus, considering aerosol dynamics is beneficial during shower exposure assessments to inform risk management interventions. The data set and associated modeling results provided can support this, as they can be readily integrated into microbial risk assessments for waterborne pathogens such as Legionella spp., nontuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa .