Exploring the transmission of cognitive task information through optimal brain pathways
Understanding the large-scale information processing that underlies complex human cognition is the central goal of cognitive neuroscience. While emerging activity flow models demonstrate that cognitive task information is transferred by interregional functional or structural connectivity, graph-theory-based models typically assume that neural communication occurs via the shortest path of brain networks. However, whether the shortest path is the optimal route for empirical cognitive information transmission remains unclear. Based on a large-scale activity flow mapping framework, we found that the performance of activity flow prediction with the shortest path was significantly lower than that with the direct path. The shortest path routing was superior to other network communication strategies, including search information, path ensembles, and navigation. Intriguingly, the shortest path outperformed the direct path in activity flow prediction when the physical distance constraint and asymmetric routing contribution were simultaneously considered. This study not only challenges the shortest path assumption through empirical network models but also suggests that cognitive task information routing is constrained by the spatial and functional embedding of the brain network.
Authors
- Kaiqiang Su (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8794-9611)
- Dazhi Yin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7461-8220)
- Yifeixue Yang
- Ziyi Huang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6985-0298)
- Zhengdong Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2509-597X)
- Wanyun Zhao
- Hengcheng Zhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2211-7026)
Institutions
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Shanghai Changning Mental Health Center (CN)
- East China Normal University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Published
- 2025-03-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012870
- Primary Topic
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities