Judicial working conditions as a field of mixed-methods research: looking at portuguese courts

The article presents a reflection on the challenges of studying judicial working conditions and its impact on the judicial professionals’ health and well-being, with a mixed-methods design and technique. It discusses the work developed on the project “QUALIS” focused on the working conditions of Portuguese judges, public prosecutors and court clerks. This contribution will contextualize the research problem and the “QUALIS” approach and share two main methodological challenges: selecting and building the data collection methods, questionnaire and interviews; and analysing the mixed-methods data results. The questionnaire and interviews were used to gather information about judicial professionals’ perceptions of working conditions in courts (e.g. physical environment, work intensity and social environment), as well as work-family conflict and the impact on health and well-being. The article highlights the importance of adapting the instruments to judicial professionals’ specificities and interests and opens the discussion on the instrument’s results apparent mismatch.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SOCIOLOGIA ON LINE
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30553/sociologiaonline.2024.36.6
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Judicial working conditions as a field of mixed-methods research: looking at portuguese courts

João Paulo Dias, Fernanda Jesus, Paula Casaleiro
SOCIOLOGIA ON LINE
Artificial Intelligence in Law
article

Judicial working conditions as a field of mixed-methods research: looking at portuguese courts

João Paulo Dias, Fernanda Jesus, Paula Casaleiro
article en

Abstract

The article presents a reflection on the challenges of studying judicial working conditions and its impact on the judicial professionals’ health and well-being, with a mixed-methods design and technique. It discusses the work developed on the project “QUALIS” focused on the working conditions of Portuguese judges, public prosecutors and court clerks. This contribution will contextualize the research problem and the “QUALIS” approach and share two main methodological challenges: selecting and building the data collection methods, questionnaire and interviews; and analysing the mixed-methods data results. The questionnaire and interviews were used to gather information about judicial professionals’ perceptions of working conditions in courts (e.g. physical environment, work intensity and social environment), as well as work-family conflict and the impact on health and well-being. The article highlights the importance of adapting the instruments to judicial professionals’ specificities and interests and opens the discussion on the instrument’s results apparent mismatch.

SOCIOLOGIA ON LINE(36)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Judicial working conditions as a field of mixed-methods research: looking at portuguese courts — João Paulo Dias, Fernanda Jesus, et al. · SOCIOLOGIA ON LINE (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS