Validation of Wind and PV Power Generation Using Historical and Forecast Weather Data

This paper presents a comparative analysis of renewable energy power output using forecast weather with different margins and historical weather data as benchmarks for selected days. The analysis evaluates the accuracy and performance trends of solar and wind forecasts against historical data, focusing on uncertainties at various forecast horizons. The benchmark hourly power generation data is used to compute relative errors, providing insights into temporal variations. Visualizations highlight the alignment between forecast trends and historical patterns, qualitatively assessing weather impacts on generation. The results for wind generation indicate that a seven-day forecast can achieve an accuracy of 80 percent, while a five-day forecast can reach an accuracy of approximately 90 percent. However, forecasts beyond ten days are only about 50 percent or less accurate compared to actual data. In contrast, the results for solar generation show comparable levels of accuracy throughout the entire forecast date but with higher average error values. This information is useful for grid operation, planning, electricity market, reliability and resilience studies and energy management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tpec63981.2025.10907101
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of Wind and PV Power Generation Using Historical and Forecast Weather Data

Thomas J. Overbye, Farnaz Safdarian, Seung Jun Lee
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
article

Validation of Wind and PV Power Generation Using Historical and Forecast Weather Data

Thomas J. Overbye, Farnaz Safdarian, Seung Jun Lee
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of renewable energy power output using forecast weather with different margins and historical weather data as benchmarks for selected days. The analysis evaluates the accuracy and performance trends of solar and wind forecasts against historical data, focusing on uncertainties at various forecast horizons. The benchmark hourly power generation data is used to compute relative errors, providing insights into temporal variations. Visualizations highlight the alignment between forecast trends and historical patterns, qualitatively assessing weather impacts on generation. The results for wind generation indicate that a seven-day forecast can achieve an accuracy of 80 percent, while a five-day forecast can reach an accuracy of approximately 90 percent. However, forecasts beyond ten days are only about 50 percent or less accurate compared to actual data. In contrast, the results for solar generation show comparable levels of accuracy throughout the entire forecast date but with higher average error values. This information is useful for grid operation, planning, electricity market, reliability and resilience studies and energy management.

Texas A&M University (US)
Texas A and M Engineering Experiment Station, Texas A and M University
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.