AI-Powered Steganographic Techniques: A Comparison of Traditional Methods and Modern Machine Learning Approaches

Steganography is pivotal for covertly embedding sensitive data in digital media to evade unauthorized detection. Traditional methods like LSB substitution and DCT are increasingly susceptible to detection due to evolving analysis and detection technologies. In contrast, AI-driven approaches such as CNNs and GANs offer significant advancements in steganography by enhancing data concealment and detection resilience. This study comprehensively compares traditional techniques (LSB, DCT) with AI-based methods (CNNs, GANs) using metrics like PSNR, SSIM, and detection accuracy. Results indicate that while traditional methods are simple to implement, AI-based techniques excel in detection resistance and data hiding quality. Specifically, DCT achieves superior image fidelity with high PSNR (36.244 to 96.954) and nearly perfect SSIM, making it ideal for robust data concealment. GANs generate images closely resembling originals with moderate PSNR (8.341 to 14.740) and SSIM (0.199 to 0.812), offering strong detection evasion albeit demanding substantial computational resources. This research emphasizes the importance of method selection tailored to specific needs, balancing computational complexity, detection resilience, and image fidelity. Future work should focus on optimizing AI algorithms for efficiency and addressing ethical implications in deploying advanced steganographic techniques.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icoris63540.2024.10903753
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Powered Steganographic Techniques: A Comparison of Traditional Methods and Modern Machine Learning Approaches

Indrawan Ady Saputro, Moch. Hari Purwidiantoro, Febrianta Surya Nugraha, Sri Widiyanti et al.
2 citations
Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
0.50
article

AI-Powered Steganographic Techniques: A Comparison of Traditional Methods and Modern Machine Learning Approaches

Indrawan Ady Saputro, Moch. Hari Purwidiantoro, Febrianta Surya Nugraha, Sri Widiyanti, Ina Sholihah Widiati
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Steganography is pivotal for covertly embedding sensitive data in digital media to evade unauthorized detection. Traditional methods like LSB substitution and DCT are increasingly susceptible to detection due to evolving analysis and detection technologies. In contrast, AI-driven approaches such as CNNs and GANs offer significant advancements in steganography by enhancing data concealment and detection resilience. This study comprehensively compares traditional techniques (LSB, DCT) with AI-based methods (CNNs, GANs) using metrics like PSNR, SSIM, and detection accuracy. Results indicate that while traditional methods are simple to implement, AI-based techniques excel in detection resistance and data hiding quality. Specifically, DCT achieves superior image fidelity with high PSNR (36.244 to 96.954) and nearly perfect SSIM, making it ideal for robust data concealment. GANs generate images closely resembling originals with moderate PSNR (8.341 to 14.740) and SSIM (0.199 to 0.812), offering strong detection evasion albeit demanding substantial computational resources. This research emphasizes the importance of method selection tailored to specific needs, balancing computational complexity, detection resilience, and image fidelity. Future work should focus on optimizing AI algorithms for efficiency and addressing ethical implications in deploying advanced steganographic techniques.

Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI-Powered Steganographic Techniques: A Comparison of Traditional Methods and Modern Machine Learning Approaches — Indrawan Ady Saputro, Moch. Hari Purwidiantoro, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS