Model, Analysis, and Design of a <i>q</i>-Axis Self-Synchronizing Current Control for Three-Phase Grid-Connected Converters

This article introduces a <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">q</i>-axis self-synchronizing current control strategy for three-phase grid-connected converters with <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">LCL</i> filters, encompassing its modeling, analysis, and design. Grid-forming converters synchronize with the grid by adjusting terminal voltage magnitude and frequency based on deviations in active and reactive power references. In contrast, grid-following converters use a phase-locked loop for synchronization, where a controller regulates output current by commanding the converter voltage. Building on these concepts, the proposed strategy achieves self-synchronization by monitoring deviations from current references and dynamically adjusting the amplitude and frequency of the synthesized voltage. This method enables a self-synchronizing current control that achieves grid synchronization independently of grid voltage measurements. Real-time hardware-in-the-loop testing validates the effectiveness of the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">q</i>-axis self-synchronizing control. It also demonstrates the accuracy of the linearized model in representing system dynamics. The control strategy maintains stable operation under both ideal and nonideal grid conditions. Furthermore, this article provides a root-locus analysis of the linearized state-space model, a detailed design methodology, and a comprehensive stability analysis, including the impact of the operating point on system dynamics. Practical aspects such as a start-up procedure and an <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">LCL</i> reactive power compensation method are also addressed to support real-world implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2025.3548550
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Microgrid Control and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model, Analysis, and Design of a q-Axis Self-Synchronizing Current Control for Three-Phase Grid-Connected Converters

Eliabe Duarte Queiroz, João I. Y. Ota, José Antenor Pomílio
3 citations
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
Microgrid Control and Optimization
3.64
article

Model, Analysis, and Design of a q-Axis Self-Synchronizing Current Control for Three-Phase Grid-Connected Converters

Eliabe Duarte Queiroz, João I. Y. Ota, José Antenor Pomílio
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article introduces a <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">q</i>-axis self-synchronizing current control strategy for three-phase grid-connected converters with <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">LCL</i> filters, encompassing its modeling, analysis, and design. Grid-forming converters synchronize with the grid by adjusting terminal voltage magnitude and frequency based on deviations in active and reactive power references. In contrast, grid-following converters use a phase-locked loop for synchronization, where a controller regulates output current by commanding the converter voltage. Building on these concepts, the proposed strategy achieves self-synchronization by monitoring deviations from current references and dynamically adjusting the amplitude and frequency of the synthesized voltage. This method enables a self-synchronizing current control that achieves grid synchronization independently of grid voltage measurements. Real-time hardware-in-the-loop testing validates the effectiveness of the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">q</i>-axis self-synchronizing control. It also demonstrates the accuracy of the linearized model in representing system dynamics. The control strategy maintains stable operation under both ideal and nonideal grid conditions. Furthermore, this article provides a root-locus analysis of the linearized state-space model, a detailed design methodology, and a comprehensive stability analysis, including the impact of the operating point on system dynamics. Practical aspects such as a start-up procedure and an <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">LCL</i> reactive power compensation method are also addressed to support real-world implementation.

IEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsVol. 40(7)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Hitachi (Sweden) (SE)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Microgrid Control and Optimization
3.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.