Autonomic Modulations to Cardiac Dynamics in Response to Affective Touch: Differences Between Social Touch and Self-Touch

The autonomic nervous system plays a vital role in self-regulation and responding to environmental demands. Autonomic dynamics have been hypothesized to be involved in perceptual awareness and establishment and maintenance of the sense of a bodily self at a neural level. We hypothesized that the autonomic activity measured from cardiac dynamics could differentiate between social touch and self-touch. In our study, we used a newly developed method to analyze the temporal dynamics of cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic activities during an ecologically valid affective touch experiment. We revealed that different types of touch conditions—social-touch, self-touch, and a control object-touch—resulted in a decrease in sympathetic activity. This decrease was more pronounced during social touch, as compared to the other conditions. Moreover, we quantified an increase in parasympathetic activity specifically during social touch, further distinguishing it from self-touch. Importantly, by combining the sympathetic and parasympathetic indices, we successfully differentiated social touch from the other experimental conditions, indicating that social touch exhibited the most substantial changes in cardiac autonomic indices. These findings may have important clinical implications as they provide insights into the neurophysiology of touch, relevant for aberrant affective touch processing in specific psychiatric disorders and for the comprehension of nociceptive touch.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/taffc.2025.3548778
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Autonomic Modulations to Cardiac Dynamics in Response to Affective Touch: Differences Between Social Touch and Self-Touch

Rebecca Boehme, Paula Salamone, Diego Candia‐Rivera
3 citations
IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
4.29
article

Autonomic Modulations to Cardiac Dynamics in Response to Affective Touch: Differences Between Social Touch and Self-Touch

Rebecca Boehme, Paula Salamone, Diego Candia‐Rivera
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The autonomic nervous system plays a vital role in self-regulation and responding to environmental demands. Autonomic dynamics have been hypothesized to be involved in perceptual awareness and establishment and maintenance of the sense of a bodily self at a neural level. We hypothesized that the autonomic activity measured from cardiac dynamics could differentiate between social touch and self-touch. In our study, we used a newly developed method to analyze the temporal dynamics of cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic activities during an ecologically valid affective touch experiment. We revealed that different types of touch conditions—social-touch, self-touch, and a control object-touch—resulted in a decrease in sympathetic activity. This decrease was more pronounced during social touch, as compared to the other conditions. Moreover, we quantified an increase in parasympathetic activity specifically during social touch, further distinguishing it from self-touch. Importantly, by combining the sympathetic and parasympathetic indices, we successfully differentiated social touch from the other experimental conditions, indicating that social touch exhibited the most substantial changes in cardiac autonomic indices. These findings may have important clinical implications as they provide insights into the neurophysiology of touch, relevant for aberrant affective touch processing in specific psychiatric disorders and for the comprehension of nociceptive touch.

IEEE Transactions on Affective ComputingVol. 16(3)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Institut du Cerveau (FR)
Vetenskapsrådet
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
4.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.