Do the “big four” orders of insects comprise evolutionarily significant higher taxa with coherent patterns of selection on protein-coding genes?

Species are often treated as evolutionarily significant units of diversity that reflect patterns of gene flow and selection. In contrast, higher taxa are mostly regarded as convenient labels for levels in the tree of life, which reflect evolutionary history if defined cladistically but are assumed to have no real significance for ongoing evolution. We test the alternative hypothesis that some higher taxa are evolutionarily significant units with coherent patterns of selection on their constituent species. Specifically, we ask whether the big 4 orders of holometabolous insects, namely Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, and Lepidoptera, display divergent, but internally conserved patterns of selection acting on protein-coding genes. Analyzing orthologous genes from whole genome sequence data for multiple species per order, we find that, in most genes, selection on roughly one fifth of codons is conserved within each order but differs significantly among orders. The shift is associated with variation in GC content among orders, but primarily at codon 2nd positions hence due to selection rather than mutational or repair bias. Comparison of alternative models assigning different taxonomic levels (either more lumped or divided than orders) shows that best models always specify Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera as coherent units, whereas patterns of selection on protein-coding genes within Coleoptera and especially Diptera are better explained by subdividing them further. We hypothesise that some aspect of the general lifestyle, body plan or genetic makeup of orders (or of nested clades within Coleoptera and Diptera) leads to conserved patterns of selection across protein-coding genes within them, whereas constraints differ among them. The emergence of whole-genome data for broad and deep phylogenetic samples will allow this hypothesis of evolutionarily significant higher taxa versus more evenly dispersed shifts in selection across genes to be tested further.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evolution Letters
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/evlett/qraf005
Primary Topic
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do the “big four” orders of insects comprise evolutionarily significant higher taxa with coherent patterns of selection on protein-coding genes?

Timothy G. Barraclough, Pierre J Février
2 links
Evolution Letters
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
article

Do the “big four” orders of insects comprise evolutionarily significant higher taxa with coherent patterns of selection on protein-coding genes?

Timothy G. Barraclough, Pierre J Février
article en

Abstract

Species are often treated as evolutionarily significant units of diversity that reflect patterns of gene flow and selection. In contrast, higher taxa are mostly regarded as convenient labels for levels in the tree of life, which reflect evolutionary history if defined cladistically but are assumed to have no real significance for ongoing evolution. We test the alternative hypothesis that some higher taxa are evolutionarily significant units with coherent patterns of selection on their constituent species. Specifically, we ask whether the big 4 orders of holometabolous insects, namely Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, and Lepidoptera, display divergent, but internally conserved patterns of selection acting on protein-coding genes. Analyzing orthologous genes from whole genome sequence data for multiple species per order, we find that, in most genes, selection on roughly one fifth of codons is conserved within each order but differs significantly among orders. The shift is associated with variation in GC content among orders, but primarily at codon 2nd positions hence due to selection rather than mutational or repair bias. Comparison of alternative models assigning different taxonomic levels (either more lumped or divided than orders) shows that best models always specify Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera as coherent units, whereas patterns of selection on protein-coding genes within Coleoptera and especially Diptera are better explained by subdividing them further. We hypothesise that some aspect of the general lifestyle, body plan or genetic makeup of orders (or of nested clades within Coleoptera and Diptera) leads to conserved patterns of selection across protein-coding genes within them, whereas constraints differ among them. The emergence of whole-genome data for broad and deep phylogenetic samples will allow this hypothesis of evolutionarily significant higher taxa versus more evenly dispersed shifts in selection across genes to be tested further.

Evolution LettersVol. 9(3)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), École Normale Supérieure de Lyon (FR), University of Oxford (GB)
Région Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.