Conceptualising Processes of User Learning in Domestication Theory

The idea that users learn about new technologies in order to make them work within their daily lives is an important concept in domestication theory. It offers a way to conceptualise technology-user co-construction across household- and societal-level trajectories, and can be applied to identify policy relevant insights. However, while cognitive, symbolic and practical dimensions of learning in domestication are well established, processes of how users learn remain under-conceptualised. To address this gap, this paper employs process analysis to examine how users learned about a novel lower-carbon home heating technology (smart hybrid heat pumps). Starting from the principle that learning emerges from interactions between elements of technologies and of users’ daily lives, it abductively develops a framework of four learning processes: receiving, experiencing, interpreting and responding. It illustrates how these four interlinked processes give rise to cognitive, symbolic and practical learning, then discusses their role in domestication trajectories and implications for policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science & Technology Studies
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.141139
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptualising Processes of User Learning in Domestication Theory

Bryony Parrish
1 citations
Science & Technology Studies
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
4.20
article

Conceptualising Processes of User Learning in Domestication Theory

Bryony Parrish
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The idea that users learn about new technologies in order to make them work within their daily lives is an important concept in domestication theory. It offers a way to conceptualise technology-user co-construction across household- and societal-level trajectories, and can be applied to identify policy relevant insights. However, while cognitive, symbolic and practical dimensions of learning in domestication are well established, processes of how users learn remain under-conceptualised. To address this gap, this paper employs process analysis to examine how users learned about a novel lower-carbon home heating technology (smart hybrid heat pumps). Starting from the principle that learning emerges from interactions between elements of technologies and of users’ daily lives, it abductively develops a framework of four learning processes: receiving, experiencing, interpreting and responding. It illustrates how these four interlinked processes give rise to cognitive, symbolic and practical learning, then discusses their role in domestication trajectories and implications for policy.

Science & Technology Studies
University of Oxford (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Conceptualising Processes of User Learning in Domestication Theory — Bryony Parrish · Science & Technology Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS