Cultural and Economic Factors in Maximizing: Differences in Rural–Urban Contexts in India

Abstract The present study aimed to understand rural–urban differences in decision-making in India, a developing country, with a particular focus on the urban context. The decision preference assessed in the study was that of maximizing, that is, searching for superior options, and satisficing, that is, choosing an adequate option. The main prediction was that people in the urban metropolitan context would maximize more than people in the rural context, and this difference would be mediated by a complex interplay of cultural, market, and economic factors. The cultural factors considered were relational mobility and perception of a tight–loose society. Further, the socio-market value of hierarchic self-interest, economic factors of income and ease of spending, and perceptions of necessity and luxury were considered. A field survey was conducted in a rural and a metropolitan region of Northern India, involving farmers and corporate employees, respectively ( N = 378). The findings show that urban participants maximized more than rural participants. This difference was mediated by factors of success orientation in hierarchic self-interest, perception of luxury, and ease of spending, highlighting the intricate nature of decision-making in different contexts. These findings have practical implications for individuals and policymakers in developing countries, particularly in the context of the transition of urbanization and the opening of markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Studies
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-025-00827-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural and Economic Factors in Maximizing: Differences in Rural–Urban Contexts in India

Klaus Boehnke, Dora Šimunović, Ulrich Kühnen, Ajita Srivastava
1 citations
Psychological Studies
Cultural Differences and Values
2.44
article

Cultural and Economic Factors in Maximizing: Differences in Rural–Urban Contexts in India

Klaus Boehnke, Dora Šimunović, Ulrich Kühnen, Ajita Srivastava
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The present study aimed to understand rural–urban differences in decision-making in India, a developing country, with a particular focus on the urban context. The decision preference assessed in the study was that of maximizing, that is, searching for superior options, and satisficing, that is, choosing an adequate option. The main prediction was that people in the urban metropolitan context would maximize more than people in the rural context, and this difference would be mediated by a complex interplay of cultural, market, and economic factors. The cultural factors considered were relational mobility and perception of a tight–loose society. Further, the socio-market value of hierarchic self-interest, economic factors of income and ease of spending, and perceptions of necessity and luxury were considered. A field survey was conducted in a rural and a metropolitan region of Northern India, involving farmers and corporate employees, respectively ( N = 378). The findings show that urban participants maximized more than rural participants. This difference was mediated by factors of success orientation in hierarchic self-interest, perception of luxury, and ease of spending, highlighting the intricate nature of decision-making in different contexts. These findings have practical implications for individuals and policymakers in developing countries, particularly in the context of the transition of urbanization and the opening of markets.

Psychological StudiesVol. 70(2)
International University (KH)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cultural Differences and Values
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.