The Academic Origins and Neo-Confucian Philosophy of Wolcheon Jo Mok

This paper aims to examine the academic origins of Jo Mok(趙穆), and to analyze his academic orientation and the characteristics of his Neo-Confucian philosophy. First, the author notes that the Dae-hak(大學) was highly valued in the reading records of both Jo Mok and scholars of the Dao Learning School(道學派), thereby inferring Jo Mok's academic tendency toward Dao Learning. Furthermore, the paper understands the relationship between Jo Mok and Yi Hwang(李滉) as a partnership of mutual enhancement and emphasizes Jo Mok's contribution to the development of the Toegye School. In addition, it specifically pointed out that Jo Mok was significantly influenced by Ju Sebung(周世鵬) in his academic pursuits. In terms of Jo Mok's academic orientation, he placed great importance on basic principles and valued academic purity. Specifically, the paper highlights that Jo Mok pursued a comprehensive understanding of context in his studies and research, and that he aimed for a consistent life grounded in an honest and genuine character. Jo Mok’s Neo-Confucian thought is analyzed with a focus on the "Sim-gyeong Pum-jil"(心經稟質), which reveals that he emphasized the introspective realization(體認) of the mind over speculative analyses of Li-Qi Xing-Qing(理氣 性情), and adhered strictly to Zhu Xi's theory of the mind and nature. The study further clarifies that Jo Mok rejected the Mind Learning(心學) of the Lu-Wang School(陸王學) and strove for self-cultivation through the teachings of the Sim-gyeong(心經) to reduce desires and reach a state of emptiness and clarity (虛明). Lastly, the author argues that Jo Mok's opposition to the peace negotiations with Japan during the Imjin War(壬辰亂) and his insistence on the principle of righteous revenge should be understood as rooted in the values of Zhu Xi's Neo-Confucianism. In short, this paper evaluates Jo Mok as a Neo-Confucian scholar who simultaneously pursued practical Dao Learning(道學) and the rigorous orthodoxy of Li Learning(理學).

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33213/thlj.2024.0.35.35
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Academic Origins and Neo-Confucian Philosophy of Wolcheon Jo Mok

Yun-su Jang
Chinese history and philosophy
article

The Academic Origins and Neo-Confucian Philosophy of Wolcheon Jo Mok

Yun-su Jang
article en

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the academic origins of Jo Mok(趙穆), and to analyze his academic orientation and the characteristics of his Neo-Confucian philosophy. First, the author notes that the Dae-hak(大學) was highly valued in the reading records of both Jo Mok and scholars of the Dao Learning School(道學派), thereby inferring Jo Mok's academic tendency toward Dao Learning. Furthermore, the paper understands the relationship between Jo Mok and Yi Hwang(李滉) as a partnership of mutual enhancement and emphasizes Jo Mok's contribution to the development of the Toegye School. In addition, it specifically pointed out that Jo Mok was significantly influenced by Ju Sebung(周世鵬) in his academic pursuits. In terms of Jo Mok's academic orientation, he placed great importance on basic principles and valued academic purity. Specifically, the paper highlights that Jo Mok pursued a comprehensive understanding of context in his studies and research, and that he aimed for a consistent life grounded in an honest and genuine character. Jo Mok’s Neo-Confucian thought is analyzed with a focus on the "Sim-gyeong Pum-jil"(心經稟質), which reveals that he emphasized the introspective realization(體認) of the mind over speculative analyses of Li-Qi Xing-Qing(理氣 性情), and adhered strictly to Zhu Xi's theory of the mind and nature. The study further clarifies that Jo Mok rejected the Mind Learning(心學) of the Lu-Wang School(陸王學) and strove for self-cultivation through the teachings of the Sim-gyeong(心經) to reduce desires and reach a state of emptiness and clarity (虛明). Lastly, the author argues that Jo Mok's opposition to the peace negotiations with Japan during the Imjin War(壬辰亂) and his insistence on the principle of righteous revenge should be understood as rooted in the values of Zhu Xi's Neo-Confucianism. In short, this paper evaluates Jo Mok as a Neo-Confucian scholar who simultaneously pursued practical Dao Learning(道學) and the rigorous orthodoxy of Li Learning(理學).

Vol. 35
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.