Refining Control, Charging, and Battery Chemistry for CO<sub>2</sub>e Savings in Heavy-Duty Off-Road Plug-In Series Hybrid

<div>With current and future regulations continuing to drive reductions in carbon dioxide equivalent (CO<sub>2</sub>e) emissions in the on-road industry, the off-road industry is also likely to be regulated for fuel and CO<sub>2</sub>e savings. This work focuses on converting a heavy-duty off-road material handler from a conventional diesel powertrain to a plug-in series hybrid, achieving a 49% fuel reduction and 29% CO<sub>2</sub>e reduction via simulation. Control strategies were refined for energy savings, including a regenerative braking strategy to increase regenerative braking and a load-following hydraulic strategy to decrease electrical energy consumption. The load-following hydraulic control shuts off the hydraulic electric machine when it is not needed—an approach not previously seen in a load-sensing, pressure-compensated system. These strategies achieved a 24.1% fuel savings, resulting in total savings of 61% in fuel and 41% in CO<sub>2</sub>e in the plug-in series compared to the conventional machine. Beyond control strategies, this study evaluated battery chemistry and charging strategy refinements for total cost of ownership (TCO) and lifetime CO<sub>2</sub>e. LFP batteries emerged as the most cost-effective and least emitting due to their longer lifespan, which reduced replacement frequency. Charging comparisons showed that Level 2 charging (L2C) typically resulted in lower TCO but higher lifetime CO<sub>2</sub>e than DC fast charging (DCFC). DCFC costs were heavily influenced by local demand charges, and DCFC emissions were heavily influenced by local grid emissions.</div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE International Journal of Electrified Vehicles
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/14-14-02-0009
Primary Topic
Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Refining Control, Charging, and Battery Chemistry for CO2e Savings in Heavy-Duty Off-Road Plug-In Series Hybrid

Bryant Goodenough, T. Andrew Black, Dylan Kiefer, Darrell Robinette et al.
SAE International Journal of Electrified Vehicles
Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
article

Refining Control, Charging, and Battery Chemistry for CO2e Savings in Heavy-Duty Off-Road Plug-In Series Hybrid

Bryant Goodenough, T. Andrew Black, Dylan Kiefer, Darrell Robinette, J.J. Westman, Jeremy Worm, Alexander Czarnecki, Phil Latendresse, Matthew J. Heath, David Subert, Bob Brunet, Robert Kisul
article en

Abstract

<div>With current and future regulations continuing to drive reductions in carbon dioxide equivalent (CO<sub>2</sub>e) emissions in the on-road industry, the off-road industry is also likely to be regulated for fuel and CO<sub>2</sub>e savings. This work focuses on converting a heavy-duty off-road material handler from a conventional diesel powertrain to a plug-in series hybrid, achieving a 49% fuel reduction and 29% CO<sub>2</sub>e reduction via simulation. Control strategies were refined for energy savings, including a regenerative braking strategy to increase regenerative braking and a load-following hydraulic strategy to decrease electrical energy consumption. The load-following hydraulic control shuts off the hydraulic electric machine when it is not needed—an approach not previously seen in a load-sensing, pressure-compensated system. These strategies achieved a 24.1% fuel savings, resulting in total savings of 61% in fuel and 41% in CO<sub>2</sub>e in the plug-in series compared to the conventional machine. Beyond control strategies, this study evaluated battery chemistry and charging strategy refinements for total cost of ownership (TCO) and lifetime CO<sub>2</sub>e. LFP batteries emerged as the most cost-effective and least emitting due to their longer lifespan, which reduced replacement frequency. Charging comparisons showed that Level 2 charging (L2C) typically resulted in lower TCO but higher lifetime CO<sub>2</sub>e than DC fast charging (DCFC). DCFC costs were heavily influenced by local demand charges, and DCFC emissions were heavily influenced by local grid emissions.</div>

SAE International Journal of Electrified VehiclesVol. 14(2)
Michigan Technological University (US), Traverse Biosciences (United States) (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.