Modified protocol comparing sporicidal activity of different non-thermal plasma generating devices

Due to the great increase in the non-thermal plasma (NTP) bio-applications, especially thanks to its antimicrobial properties, many types of NTP generating devices have been developed recently. However, a comparison of these devices is difficult due to the differences in the setup of studies testing them, e.g., in species of microorganisms used and sample preparations. In this study, we optimized a robust and reproducible standard protocol using Bacillus subtilis spores and applied it to compare seven different NTP generating devices in terms of technical parameters and sporicidal properties. Inhibition zones determined using the Aurora software and the complete inhibition of bacteria growth induced by the NTP treatment were analyzed to determine both local and overall effects, respectively. The highest sporicidal efficacy of the tested devices was achieved by the volume dielectric barrier discharge from Wroclaw, which inhibited 99.9% of colony forming units after 30 min of exposure. To our knowledge, a comparative study of this extent has not been published to date. The presented protocol is based on an established bacterial method and can therefore serve as a general standard for an effective comparison of NTP sources across laboratories worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91279-3
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modified protocol comparing sporicidal activity of different non-thermal plasma generating devices

Vladimír Scholtz, Anna Machková, L. Cordaro, Eva Vaňková et al.
4 citations
Scientific Reports
Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
5.44
article

Modified protocol comparing sporicidal activity of different non-thermal plasma generating devices

Vladimír Scholtz, Anna Machková, L. Cordaro, Eva Vaňková, E. Martines, Josef Khun, J. Brotánková, Tomasz Czapka, G. Masi, Jan Hrudka, Leonardo Zampieri
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Due to the great increase in the non-thermal plasma (NTP) bio-applications, especially thanks to its antimicrobial properties, many types of NTP generating devices have been developed recently. However, a comparison of these devices is difficult due to the differences in the setup of studies testing them, e.g., in species of microorganisms used and sample preparations. In this study, we optimized a robust and reproducible standard protocol using Bacillus subtilis spores and applied it to compare seven different NTP generating devices in terms of technical parameters and sporicidal properties. Inhibition zones determined using the Aurora software and the complete inhibition of bacteria growth induced by the NTP treatment were analyzed to determine both local and overall effects, respectively. The highest sporicidal efficacy of the tested devices was achieved by the volume dielectric barrier discharge from Wroclaw, which inhibited 99.9% of colony forming units after 30 min of exposure. To our knowledge, a comparative study of this extent has not been published to date. The presented protocol is based on an established bacterial method and can therefore serve as a general standard for an effective comparison of NTP sources across laboratories worldwide.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (IT), Wrocław University of Science and Technology (PL), Institute for the Science and Technology of Plasmas (IT), Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT), AGH University of Krakow (PL), University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague (CZ)
European Cooperation in Science and Technology
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
5.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.