The influence of dimensions on the complexity of computing decision trees
A decision tree recursively splits a feature space R d and then assigns class labels based on the resulting partition. Decision trees have been part of the basic machine-learning toolkit for decades. A large body of work considers heuristic algorithms that compute a decision tree from training data, usually aiming to minimize in particular the size of the resulting tree. In contrast, little is known about the complexity of the underlying computational problem of computing a minimum-size tree for the given training data. We study this problem with respect to the number d of dimensions of the feature space R d , which contains n training examples. We show that it can be solved in O ( n 2 d + 1 ) time, but under reasonable complexity-theoretic assumptions it is not possible to achieve f ( d ) ⋅ n o ( d / log d ) running time. The problem is solvable in ( d R ) O ( d R ) ⋅ n 1 + o ( 1 ) time if there are exactly two classes and R is an upper bound on the number of tree leaves labeled with the first class.
Authors
- Stephen Kobourov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0477-2724)
- Fabrizio Montecchiani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0543-8912)
- Jules Wulms (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9314-8260)
- Manuel Sorge (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7394-3147)
- Maarten Löffler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9403-8856)
- Ignaz Rutter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3794-4406)
- Marcin Pilipczuk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5680-7397)
- Raimund Seidel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2349-785X)
Institutions
- TU Wien (AT)
- University of Passau (DE)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- University of Perugia (IT)
- University of Warsaw (PL)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Saarland University (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Artificial Intelligence
- Published
- 2025-03-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2025.104322
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 16.23