Dynamic Modeling and Optimization of Long-Haul EV Charging Networks

The transportation sector is an important contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with heavy-duty freight vehicles accounting for 31% of total transportation emissions in the United States. Electrifying long-haul freight vehicles presents a viable pathway to reduce emissions. Still, it has challenges such as limited high-power charging infrastructure, increased journey times, and regulatory constraints that hinder its widespread adoption. This study proposes a comprehensive optimization framework to address these challenges by integrating realistic charging station modeling, a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model for scheduling and multi-route optimization. The methodology leverages existing truck stop infrastructure, incorporates dynamic factors such as energy prices and station capacities, and adheres to operational constraints such as hours of service (HOS) regulations. The simulation results for three routes between Los Angeles, California, and San Antonio, Texas demonstrate trade-offs between cost, energy efficiency, and delivery performance, highlighting the importance of balancing these metrics. The findings underscore the critical role of advanced scheduling strategies in minimizing delays and costs and supporting the sustainable electrification of long-haul freight operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tpec63981.2025.10907255
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Modeling and Optimization of Long-Haul EV Charging Networks

Nikolaos Gatsis, Luis Barba, Sara Ahmed, Miltiadis Alamaniotis
2 citations
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
1.46
article

Dynamic Modeling and Optimization of Long-Haul EV Charging Networks

Nikolaos Gatsis, Luis Barba, Sara Ahmed, Miltiadis Alamaniotis
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The transportation sector is an important contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with heavy-duty freight vehicles accounting for 31% of total transportation emissions in the United States. Electrifying long-haul freight vehicles presents a viable pathway to reduce emissions. Still, it has challenges such as limited high-power charging infrastructure, increased journey times, and regulatory constraints that hinder its widespread adoption. This study proposes a comprehensive optimization framework to address these challenges by integrating realistic charging station modeling, a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model for scheduling and multi-route optimization. The methodology leverages existing truck stop infrastructure, incorporates dynamic factors such as energy prices and station capacities, and adheres to operational constraints such as hours of service (HOS) regulations. The simulation results for three routes between Los Angeles, California, and San Antonio, Texas demonstrate trade-offs between cost, energy efficiency, and delivery performance, highlighting the importance of balancing these metrics. The findings underscore the critical role of advanced scheduling strategies in minimizing delays and costs and supporting the sustainable electrification of long-haul freight operations.

The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dynamic Modeling and Optimization of Long-Haul EV Charging Networks — Nikolaos Gatsis, Luis Barba, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS