Assessing racial disparities in healthcare expenditure using generalized propensity score weighting

We found that generalized propensity score weighting (GPSW) methods are valuable quantitative tools to standardize and compare characteristics as well as outcomes of non-manipulable groups. This helps assess disparities across multiple racial and ethnic groups, as demonstrated in this study. These methods offer flexible and semi-parametric analysis on the primary causal parameters of interest (such as the racial disparities), with straightforward and intuitive interpretations. In addition, when there is violation of the positivity assumption, OWATT serves as an excellent alternative due to its greater efficiency, evidenced by relatively smaller variance. More importantly, the OWATT uses the entire dataset by assigning weights to all participants, regardless of their propensity score values. This feature of OWATT circumvents the need to specify user-defined thresholds, as required in ATT trimming or truncation, and retains as much data information as possible, leading to more reliable estimation results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02508-2
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.89

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing racial disparities in healthcare expenditure using generalized propensity score weighting

Yi Liu, Jiajun Liu, Yunji Zhou, Roland Matsouaka
3 citations
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
7.89
article

Assessing racial disparities in healthcare expenditure using generalized propensity score weighting

Yi Liu, Jiajun Liu, Yunji Zhou, Roland Matsouaka
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We found that generalized propensity score weighting (GPSW) methods are valuable quantitative tools to standardize and compare characteristics as well as outcomes of non-manipulable groups. This helps assess disparities across multiple racial and ethnic groups, as demonstrated in this study. These methods offer flexible and semi-parametric analysis on the primary causal parameters of interest (such as the racial disparities), with straightforward and intuitive interpretations. In addition, when there is violation of the positivity assumption, OWATT serves as an excellent alternative due to its greater efficiency, evidenced by relatively smaller variance. More importantly, the OWATT uses the entire dataset by assigning weights to all participants, regardless of their propensity score values. This feature of OWATT circumvents the need to specify user-defined thresholds, as required in ATT trimming or truncation, and retains as much data information as possible, leading to more reliable estimation results.

BMC Medical Research MethodologyVol. 25(1)
North Carolina State University (US), Duke University (US), University of Washington (US), Clinical Research Institute (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
7.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.