Beyond Bombs and Bullets

Abstract The Indo-Naxalite conflict, situated in India’s resource-rich Red Corridor, presents a complex interplay of socio-political strife, environmental degradation, and natural resource mismanagement. This paper examines the conflict as a non-international armed conflict ( niac ) under international law, emphasizing the legal obligations of both the Indian State and Naxalite forces regarding environmental harm and resource exploitation. Drawing from International Humanitarian Law ( ihl ), International Human Rights Law ( ihrl ), and International Environmental Law ( iel ), it critiques the inadequacy of existing frameworks to address the dual crises of armed violence and ecological degradation. The paper highlights the role of mismanaged resources in fueling hostilities and undermining tribal livelihoods while proposing a peacebuilding approach prioritizing sustainable resource management and human rights protection. Through the lens of this conflict, the analysis offers broader insights into the intersection of resource exploitation, environmental harm, and transitional justice in armed conflicts globally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/18781527-bja10112
Primary Topic
Race, History, and American Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Bombs and Bullets

Pratik Purswani, Adithi Rajesh
Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies
Race, History, and American Society
article

Beyond Bombs and Bullets

Pratik Purswani, Adithi Rajesh
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Indo-Naxalite conflict, situated in India’s resource-rich Red Corridor, presents a complex interplay of socio-political strife, environmental degradation, and natural resource mismanagement. This paper examines the conflict as a non-international armed conflict ( niac ) under international law, emphasizing the legal obligations of both the Indian State and Naxalite forces regarding environmental harm and resource exploitation. Drawing from International Humanitarian Law ( ihl ), International Human Rights Law ( ihrl ), and International Environmental Law ( iel ), it critiques the inadequacy of existing frameworks to address the dual crises of armed violence and ecological degradation. The paper highlights the role of mismanaged resources in fueling hostilities and undermining tribal livelihoods while proposing a peacebuilding approach prioritizing sustainable resource management and human rights protection. Through the lens of this conflict, the analysis offers broader insights into the intersection of resource exploitation, environmental harm, and transitional justice in armed conflicts globally.

Journal of International Humanitarian Legal StudiesVol. 16(1)
O. P. Jindal Global University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Race, History, and American Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond Bombs and Bullets — Pratik Purswani, Adithi Rajesh · Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS