A Brief Discussion on the Differences Between Yu Dafu and Shi Zhecuns Morbid

Morbid description has long held unique symbolic meanings in the history of Chinese literature. Yu Dafu and Shi Zhecun, two distinguished writers of modern Chinese literature, have drawn significant attention with their distinctive approaches to depicting Morbid. This article aims to delve into the differences in the depiction of Morbid between these two authors, through which we can discover the fact that there are distinct differences in the psychological analysis characteristics, and the focus of sexual-related descriptions. Yu Dafu presents psychological Morbid in a direct and intense way, while Shi Zhecun prefers delicate psychological description and complex character relationships, in order to reflect the multifaceted nature of humanity. All in all, their depiction of Morbid both have profound social and historical values, pushing forward the innovation of Chinese literature and the development of psychological analysis novels, enriching the expressive power and aesthetic dimensions of literature, which provides readers with a more diverse reading experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.21303
Primary Topic
Medical Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Brief Discussion on the Differences Between Yu Dafu and Shi Zhecuns Morbid

Yuepeng Wang, Jianxi Zhu
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Medical Research and Treatments
article

A Brief Discussion on the Differences Between Yu Dafu and Shi Zhecuns Morbid

Yuepeng Wang, Jianxi Zhu
article en

Abstract

Morbid description has long held unique symbolic meanings in the history of Chinese literature. Yu Dafu and Shi Zhecun, two distinguished writers of modern Chinese literature, have drawn significant attention with their distinctive approaches to depicting Morbid. This article aims to delve into the differences in the depiction of Morbid between these two authors, through which we can discover the fact that there are distinct differences in the psychological analysis characteristics, and the focus of sexual-related descriptions. Yu Dafu presents psychological Morbid in a direct and intense way, while Shi Zhecun prefers delicate psychological description and complex character relationships, in order to reflect the multifaceted nature of humanity. All in all, their depiction of Morbid both have profound social and historical values, pushing forward the innovation of Chinese literature and the development of psychological analysis novels, enriching the expressive power and aesthetic dimensions of literature, which provides readers with a more diverse reading experience.

Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public MediaVol. 85(1)
Zhejiang Normal University (CN), Nanjing Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Medical Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Brief Discussion on the Differences Between Yu Dafu and Shi Zhecuns Morbid — Yuepeng Wang, Jianxi Zhu · Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS