Differences between priming and rhizosphere priming effects: Concepts and mechanisms

The addition of fresh carbon (C) substrates to the soil can result either in the acceleration or retardation of native soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition, referred to as the priming effect (PE). Related to PE is the rhizosphere priming effect (RPE), which involves the activity of plant roots. It remains unclear whether PE and RPE differ in their impacts on soil C dynamics and their response to soil nitrogen (N) availability. Here, we highlight drivers and mechanisms that distinguish RPE from PE and how they change with N addition. We develop different scenarios for PE and RPE separately and their responses to N addition. We describe temporal differences between PE and RPE, where microbes become more C limited with time in PE studies and more N limited in RPE studies. We then analysed published data to assess support for our scenarios. Without N addition PE and RPE were mostly positive and of similar magnitude, indicating that stoichiometric decomposition under microbial C limitation and N mining under microbial N limitation are major drivers of PE and RPE. Root effects on physical and chemical destabilization of native SOM and plant-microbe competition for N may also cause positive RPEs. With N addition, more than half of all observations showed reductions in PE (56%) and RPE (51%), possibly because of N-induced soil acidification. The RPEs and their responses to N could potentially last longer than for PE, due to ongoing root-induced destabilization of SOM and competition for N between plants and microbes thereby maintaining microbial N limitation and N mining. The distinctly different mechanisms and temporal dynamics between PE and RPE will have important implications for short- and long-term SOM dynamics and their responses to N addition. • Priming effect (PE) and rhizosphere priming effect (RPE) differ mechanistically. • Microbes become more C limited with time for PE but more N limited for RPE. • PE and RPE are mostly positive and of similar magnitude. • Stoichiometric decomposition and N mining are major drivers for PE and RPE. • N addition reduced PE in 56% and RPE in 51% of all observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109769
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
23.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences between priming and rhizosphere priming effects: Concepts and mechanisms

Charles R. Warren, Feike A. Dijkstra, Balwant Singh, Anna Favaro
20 citations
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
23.72
article

Differences between priming and rhizosphere priming effects: Concepts and mechanisms

Charles R. Warren, Feike A. Dijkstra, Balwant Singh, Anna Favaro
article en
20 citations

Abstract

The addition of fresh carbon (C) substrates to the soil can result either in the acceleration or retardation of native soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition, referred to as the priming effect (PE). Related to PE is the rhizosphere priming effect (RPE), which involves the activity of plant roots. It remains unclear whether PE and RPE differ in their impacts on soil C dynamics and their response to soil nitrogen (N) availability. Here, we highlight drivers and mechanisms that distinguish RPE from PE and how they change with N addition. We develop different scenarios for PE and RPE separately and their responses to N addition. We describe temporal differences between PE and RPE, where microbes become more C limited with time in PE studies and more N limited in RPE studies. We then analysed published data to assess support for our scenarios. Without N addition PE and RPE were mostly positive and of similar magnitude, indicating that stoichiometric decomposition under microbial C limitation and N mining under microbial N limitation are major drivers of PE and RPE. Root effects on physical and chemical destabilization of native SOM and plant-microbe competition for N may also cause positive RPEs. With N addition, more than half of all observations showed reductions in PE (56%) and RPE (51%), possibly because of N-induced soil acidification. The RPEs and their responses to N could potentially last longer than for PE, due to ongoing root-induced destabilization of SOM and competition for N between plants and microbes thereby maintaining microbial N limitation and N mining. The distinctly different mechanisms and temporal dynamics between PE and RPE will have important implications for short- and long-term SOM dynamics and their responses to N addition. • Priming effect (PE) and rhizosphere priming effect (RPE) differ mechanistically. • Microbes become more C limited with time for PE but more N limited for RPE. • PE and RPE are mostly positive and of similar magnitude. • Stoichiometric decomposition and N mining are major drivers for PE and RPE. • N addition reduced PE in 56% and RPE in 51% of all observations.

Soil Biology and BiochemistryVol. 205
The University of Sydney (AU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
23.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.