What is Family and Group Conferencing for adults? Part 1: Characterising the model and methods of enquiry

<ns7:p>Background Family and Group Conferencing (FGC) is a relatively new strengths-based approach applied to adults needing social care and mental health support in the UK. Although the approach is well established in children’s services in the UK, few services currently offer FGCs to adults; therefore, there is limited evidence regarding FGCs in the adult services context in the UK. This study aims to fill this gap by examining how FGCs work and what differences they can make in people’s lives. Methods This paper (Part 1) addresses the first of two related research questions, aiming to characterize the practice model(s) that pertain to the context of adults’ FGCs as currently offered. We employed a mixed methods research design drawing on data from both, previous literature as well as current practice by undertaking a comprehensive literature review, national survey and stakeholder interviews with current services and a deliberative forum involving a range of stakeholders pertaining to adult FGCs. Results Although there is some variation in the practice model(s) offered by services, the overall approach is underpinned by a relatively consistent set of values and principles, although these are often implicit. The FGC offers a staged approach that enables people and their networks to take greater control over their support arrangements. It is seen as an appropriate service offer across all adults and mental health services with the potential to result in a range of positive outcomes (as will be discussed in Part 2). Conclusion Central to achieving this is flexibility within the service offer to accommodate the social and cultural needs of the individual and their network, the independence of the FGC coordinator, the necessity of sufficient preparation for all participants, and rapport building in advance of the Conference.</ns7:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NIHR Open Research
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13811.1
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is Family and Group Conferencing for adults? Part 1: Characterising the model and methods of enquiry

Sharanya Mahesh, M R Johnson, Asim Aziz, Vicky Nicholls et al.
3 citations
NIHR Open Research
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
7.32
article

What is Family and Group Conferencing for adults? Part 1: Characterising the model and methods of enquiry

Sharanya Mahesh, M R Johnson, Asim Aziz, Vicky Nicholls, Mary Mitchell, Jerry Tew, Tonia L. Vincent, Kar-Man Au
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<ns7:p>Background Family and Group Conferencing (FGC) is a relatively new strengths-based approach applied to adults needing social care and mental health support in the UK. Although the approach is well established in children’s services in the UK, few services currently offer FGCs to adults; therefore, there is limited evidence regarding FGCs in the adult services context in the UK. This study aims to fill this gap by examining how FGCs work and what differences they can make in people’s lives. Methods This paper (Part 1) addresses the first of two related research questions, aiming to characterize the practice model(s) that pertain to the context of adults’ FGCs as currently offered. We employed a mixed methods research design drawing on data from both, previous literature as well as current practice by undertaking a comprehensive literature review, national survey and stakeholder interviews with current services and a deliberative forum involving a range of stakeholders pertaining to adult FGCs. Results Although there is some variation in the practice model(s) offered by services, the overall approach is underpinned by a relatively consistent set of values and principles, although these are often implicit. The FGC offers a staged approach that enables people and their networks to take greater control over their support arrangements. It is seen as an appropriate service offer across all adults and mental health services with the potential to result in a range of positive outcomes (as will be discussed in Part 2). Conclusion Central to achieving this is flexibility within the service offer to accommodate the social and cultural needs of the individual and their network, the independence of the FGC coordinator, the necessity of sufficient preparation for all participants, and rapport building in advance of the Conference.</ns7:p>

NIHR Open ResearchVol. 5
Westminster City Council (GB), Bromley College of Further and Higher Education (GB), Center for Independent Living (US), Cardiff University (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
7.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.