In Vitro Assessment of the Effectiveness of Mineral Adsorbents in Sequestering Boar Taint Compounds

The utility of four mineral adsorbents as potential feed additives to bind the boar taint compounds, androstenone and skatole, was assessed with an in vitro system. The adsorbents were bentonite (BNT), diatomaceous earth (DE), spent filter aid (SFA) and hydrated sodium-calcium aluminosilicate (HSCAS), with activated charcoal (AC) as a positive control. The binding capacity (B<sub>max</sub>) and binding affinity (K) of androstenone (AND), estrone (E1), estrone sulfate (E1S), and skatole were estimated using the modified Michaelis-Menten kinetics. The Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models were also used to assess the adsorption behaviour. The B<sub>max</sub> values with AND were 77.7 ± 1.12%, 71.9 ± 1.93%, 55.0 ± 7.85%, and 69.5 ± 1.39% for BNT, DE, SFA, and HSCAS, respectively, with no differences in the binding affinity K (<i>p</i> > 0.05). All the mineral adsorbents had very low binding with E1S. SFA bound skatole with a B<sub>max</sub> of 89.9 ± 1.09%, while the B<sub>max</sub> values for skatole binding by BNT, DE and HCAS were approximately 15%. Most adsorbent-adsorbate complexes fit best with the Freundlich isotherm model. We conclude that all four mineral adsorbents bound androstenone, but not E1S, and only SFA effectively bound skatole. This suggests that SFA may act as a selective dietary binding agent to control boar taint, but further research using animal models is needed to explore the utility and selectivity of these adsorbents as feed additives to control boar taint.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15060765
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Dental Erosion and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Vitro Assessment of the Effectiveness of Mineral Adsorbents in Sequestering Boar Taint Compounds

Sanghyuk Park, E. James Squires
2 citations
Animals
Dental Erosion and Treatment
3.35
article

In Vitro Assessment of the Effectiveness of Mineral Adsorbents in Sequestering Boar Taint Compounds

Sanghyuk Park, E. James Squires
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The utility of four mineral adsorbents as potential feed additives to bind the boar taint compounds, androstenone and skatole, was assessed with an in vitro system. The adsorbents were bentonite (BNT), diatomaceous earth (DE), spent filter aid (SFA) and hydrated sodium-calcium aluminosilicate (HSCAS), with activated charcoal (AC) as a positive control. The binding capacity (B<sub>max</sub>) and binding affinity (K) of androstenone (AND), estrone (E1), estrone sulfate (E1S), and skatole were estimated using the modified Michaelis-Menten kinetics. The Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models were also used to assess the adsorption behaviour. The B<sub>max</sub> values with AND were 77.7 ± 1.12%, 71.9 ± 1.93%, 55.0 ± 7.85%, and 69.5 ± 1.39% for BNT, DE, SFA, and HSCAS, respectively, with no differences in the binding affinity K (<i>p</i> > 0.05). All the mineral adsorbents had very low binding with E1S. SFA bound skatole with a B<sub>max</sub> of 89.9 ± 1.09%, while the B<sub>max</sub> values for skatole binding by BNT, DE and HCAS were approximately 15%. Most adsorbent-adsorbate complexes fit best with the Freundlich isotherm model. We conclude that all four mineral adsorbents bound androstenone, but not E1S, and only SFA effectively bound skatole. This suggests that SFA may act as a selective dietary binding agent to control boar taint, but further research using animal models is needed to explore the utility and selectivity of these adsorbents as feed additives to control boar taint.

AnimalsVol. 15(6)
University of Guelph (CA)
Swine Innovation Porc, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Dental Erosion and Treatment
3.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.