The Raven and the Sea: The Lost Intertidal World of Eighteenth-Century Ornithology

Abstract In the Book of Genesis, the raven’s failure to return to Noah’s ark proves his apostasy. Biblical exegetes from Augustine to Jonathan Edwards describe the raven’s bad terrestrial habits: a carnivorous, scavenging nature enables the raven to survive on dead animals washed up on bare patches of land. This article argues that eighteenth-century ornithology inherits this biblical bias against the raven, confining natural historical depictions of the bird to a terrestrial plane to demarcate unregenerative nature. When read in relation to the oral literature of the Indigenous Pacific Northwest, Western ornithology’s discomfort with the raven’s maritime presence and stringent relegation of the bird to barren land becomes vividly apparent. In Haida, Tlingit, and other Northwest Pacific Indigenous traditions, the raven operates through an intertidal ecology to serve a prominent role as figure of creation and mischief. Reading the raven’s rise and simultaneous erasure in eighteenth-century ornithology alongside the Indigenous literatures of the Pacific Northwest restores some of this lost knowledge not only of Alaskan Native literature but also of what this oral tradition reveals about the lost worlds and recuperative possibilities at the heart of the Euro-Western tradition.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
American Literature
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/00029831-11792427
Primary Topic
History of Science and Natural History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Raven and the Sea: The Lost Intertidal World of Eighteenth-Century Ornithology

Sarah Rivett
American Literature
History of Science and Natural History
article

The Raven and the Sea: The Lost Intertidal World of Eighteenth-Century Ornithology

Sarah Rivett
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the Book of Genesis, the raven’s failure to return to Noah’s ark proves his apostasy. Biblical exegetes from Augustine to Jonathan Edwards describe the raven’s bad terrestrial habits: a carnivorous, scavenging nature enables the raven to survive on dead animals washed up on bare patches of land. This article argues that eighteenth-century ornithology inherits this biblical bias against the raven, confining natural historical depictions of the bird to a terrestrial plane to demarcate unregenerative nature. When read in relation to the oral literature of the Indigenous Pacific Northwest, Western ornithology’s discomfort with the raven’s maritime presence and stringent relegation of the bird to barren land becomes vividly apparent. In Haida, Tlingit, and other Northwest Pacific Indigenous traditions, the raven operates through an intertidal ecology to serve a prominent role as figure of creation and mischief. Reading the raven’s rise and simultaneous erasure in eighteenth-century ornithology alongside the Indigenous literatures of the Pacific Northwest restores some of this lost knowledge not only of Alaskan Native literature but also of what this oral tradition reveals about the lost worlds and recuperative possibilities at the heart of the Euro-Western tradition.

American LiteratureVol. 97(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
History of Science and Natural History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Raven and the Sea: The Lost Intertidal World of Eighteenth-Century Ornithology — Sarah Rivett · American Literature (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS