Establishing a unified evaluation framework for human motion generation: A comparative analysis of metrics

The development of generative artificial intelligence for human motion generation has expanded rapidly, necessitating a unified evaluation framework. This paper presents a detailed review of eight evaluation metrics for human motion generation, highlighting their unique features and shortcomings. We propose standardized practices through a unified evaluation setup to facilitate consistent model comparisons. Additionally, we introduce a novel metric that assesses diversity in temporal distortion by analyzing warping diversity, thereby enhancing the evaluation of temporal data. We also conduct experimental analyses of three generative models using two publicly available datasets, offering insights into the interpretation of each metric in specific case scenarios. Our goal is to offer a clear, user-friendly evaluation framework for newcomers, complemented by publicly accessible code: https://github.com/MSD-IRIMAS/Evaluating-HMG . • Summarizing key metrics, their mathematical setup, and interpretation in literature. • Introducing Warping Path Diversity (WPD) to measure temporal diversity in motion. • Defining a fair, unified setup for evaluating generative models. • Open source friendly code: https://github.com/MSD-IRIMAS/Evaluating-HMG .

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computer Vision and Image Understanding
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2025.104337
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Human Motion and Animation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Establishing a unified evaluation framework for human motion generation: A comparative analysis of metrics

Stefano Berretti, Germain Forestier, Jonathan Weber, Maxime Devanne et al.
8 citations
Computer Vision and Image Understanding
Human Motion and Animation
9.72
article

Establishing a unified evaluation framework for human motion generation: A comparative analysis of metrics

Stefano Berretti, Germain Forestier, Jonathan Weber, Maxime Devanne, Ali Ismail-Fawaz
article en
8 citations

Abstract

The development of generative artificial intelligence for human motion generation has expanded rapidly, necessitating a unified evaluation framework. This paper presents a detailed review of eight evaluation metrics for human motion generation, highlighting their unique features and shortcomings. We propose standardized practices through a unified evaluation setup to facilitate consistent model comparisons. Additionally, we introduce a novel metric that assesses diversity in temporal distortion by analyzing warping diversity, thereby enhancing the evaluation of temporal data. We also conduct experimental analyses of three generative models using two publicly available datasets, offering insights into the interpretation of each metric in specific case scenarios. Our goal is to offer a clear, user-friendly evaluation framework for newcomers, complemented by publicly accessible code: https://github.com/MSD-IRIMAS/Evaluating-HMG . • Summarizing key metrics, their mathematical setup, and interpretation in literature. • Introducing Warping Path Diversity (WPD) to measure temporal diversity in motion. • Defining a fair, unified setup for evaluating generative models. • Open source friendly code: https://github.com/MSD-IRIMAS/Evaluating-HMG .

Computer Vision and Image UnderstandingVol. 254
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Human Motion and Animation
9.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.