Distinguishing between wild-caught and captive-bred Common Pheasant using methylation rate of skeletal muscle DNA

Illegal hunting and trafficking of wildlife and their derivatives extort unprecedented population decline of relatively many species pushing them towards extinction. Notwithstanding contemporary counteracting interventions at international, regional, national and local levels, wildlife farming is advocated as an alternative approach to minimize pressure on wild populations. For wildlife farming to be an effective conservation tool, the integration of wildlife forensics is inevitable to allow distinction between captive-bred and wild-caught species. To this end, we analyzed methylation rates of skeletal muscle samples (pectoralis major, triceps brachii, gastrocnemius, biceps femoris, and neck muscles) from 60 captive-bred and 30 wild-caught Common Pheasant. A total of 13,507 differentially methylated regions were identified between five wild-caught and five captive-bred individuals through whole-genome methylation sequencing (WGBS). Based on the selected five methylation sites, LOC116231076 , LOC116242223 , ATAD2B , EGFL6 , and HS2ST , quantitative detection technique was developed using methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting curve (MS-HRM) to measure methylation rates. The results showed significant differences in methylation rates at all differential sites between wild-caught and captive-bred individuals (| t | = 0.67–33.10, P = 0.000–0.042). The discrimination accuracy rate of each locus was highest in the gastrocnemius muscle and lowest in the neck muscle. The discrimination accuracy rate on LOC116231076 , LOC116242223 , ATAD2B , EGFL6 , and HS2ST methylation sites for gastrocnemius muscle was 64.98%, 100.00%, 68.54%, 63.79%, and 63.70%, respectively; and for neck muscle it was 67.42%, 68.06%, 83.61%, 65.04%, and 68.85%, respectively. The united discrimination accuracy rate of the five loci were 100.00% for gastrocnemius muscle, 99.78% for biceps femoris muscle, 97.52% for pectoralis major muscle, 93.96% for triceps brachii muscle, and 91.63% for neck muscle, respectively. The panel also revealed excellent repeatability, reproducibility, sensitivity and universality to mammals and avian species. This study establishes an effective, accurate and low-cost identification technology for the identification of wild and farmed Common Pheasant, and also provides a reference for the development of identification methods for other species.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Avian Research
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avrs.2025.100234
Primary Topic
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinguishing between wild-caught and captive-bred Common Pheasant using methylation rate of skeletal muscle DNA

Chang Su, Yue Ma, Yanchun Xu, Peng Gao et al.
Avian Research
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
article

Distinguishing between wild-caught and captive-bred Common Pheasant using methylation rate of skeletal muscle DNA

Chang Su, Yue Ma, Yanchun Xu, Peng Gao, Meini Yu, Yongheng Zhou, Elizabeth Kamili, Lijun Lin, Qi Zhang, Yan Cui, Boyang Liu, Wenhui Wang, Yujia Du, Liangyu Cui, Yu Zhou, Yuwei Gao, Shuhui Yang, Jincheng Yang
article en

Abstract

Illegal hunting and trafficking of wildlife and their derivatives extort unprecedented population decline of relatively many species pushing them towards extinction. Notwithstanding contemporary counteracting interventions at international, regional, national and local levels, wildlife farming is advocated as an alternative approach to minimize pressure on wild populations. For wildlife farming to be an effective conservation tool, the integration of wildlife forensics is inevitable to allow distinction between captive-bred and wild-caught species. To this end, we analyzed methylation rates of skeletal muscle samples (pectoralis major, triceps brachii, gastrocnemius, biceps femoris, and neck muscles) from 60 captive-bred and 30 wild-caught Common Pheasant. A total of 13,507 differentially methylated regions were identified between five wild-caught and five captive-bred individuals through whole-genome methylation sequencing (WGBS). Based on the selected five methylation sites, LOC116231076 , LOC116242223 , ATAD2B , EGFL6 , and HS2ST , quantitative detection technique was developed using methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting curve (MS-HRM) to measure methylation rates. The results showed significant differences in methylation rates at all differential sites between wild-caught and captive-bred individuals (| t | = 0.67–33.10, P = 0.000–0.042). The discrimination accuracy rate of each locus was highest in the gastrocnemius muscle and lowest in the neck muscle. The discrimination accuracy rate on LOC116231076 , LOC116242223 , ATAD2B , EGFL6 , and HS2ST methylation sites for gastrocnemius muscle was 64.98%, 100.00%, 68.54%, 63.79%, and 63.70%, respectively; and for neck muscle it was 67.42%, 68.06%, 83.61%, 65.04%, and 68.85%, respectively. The united discrimination accuracy rate of the five loci were 100.00% for gastrocnemius muscle, 99.78% for biceps femoris muscle, 97.52% for pectoralis major muscle, 93.96% for triceps brachii muscle, and 91.63% for neck muscle, respectively. The panel also revealed excellent repeatability, reproducibility, sensitivity and universality to mammals and avian species. This study establishes an effective, accurate and low-cost identification technology for the identification of wild and farmed Common Pheasant, and also provides a reference for the development of identification methods for other species.

Avian ResearchVol. 16(2)
Education Department of Heilongjiang Province (CN), Northeast Forestry University (CN)
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.