Evaluation of color impression using abstract and color-related semantic words and selection of suitable colors that express the word impression of these words

In this study, we investigate two hypotheses for determining color impression. Color impression can be directly determined by color appearance, especially in the case of the paired comparison, or by the combination of semantic impressions defined by words [especially in the semantic differential (SD) method]. We measured the color impression of 12 chromatic colors, black, gray, and white, using seven paired semantic words related to color properties and impressions and eight paired abstract words in the SD method. We also asked 10 observers to select the appropriate colors from the 15 colors in the paired comparison method for each word. Principal component analysis was applied to the data. In the results of the SD method, the coordinates of the colors on the space of the first and second principal component axes are basically spread as the hue circle but are more clustered than in the results of the paired comparison because the semantic words at higher grading points of the SD method are similar between neighboring colors. In the results of the paired comparison, the coordinates of the colors as loading values maintained the hue circle, and the color selection rates for the words in the paired comparison showed strong correlations with one of the color properties (<i>L</i><sup>∗</sup>,<i>a</i><sup>∗</sup>,<i>b</i><sup>∗</sup>, and <i>C</i><sup>∗</sup>), except for Murky, as do the grading points for the colors in the SD method, showing that color appearance can mostly determine color impression using words directly and relatively related to colors (except Vivid and Murky), but not using some of the abstract words (such as Clean, Magnificent, and Deserted). The direct comparison between the two methods suggests that the evaluation of color-related words is not directly determined by the color appearance and color category of the stimulus colors. Instead, the color image and color impression that have already been obtained through daily life and experiences influence color impressions more in color-related words. Color evaluations using words directly and relatively related to colors in the SD method is a more complex process and can be influenced more by the interaction between the semantic meanings of the words and the color appearance. In contrast, the evaluation of the paired comparison suggests that color appearance simply and directly determines word evaluation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Optical Society of America A
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.546984
Primary Topic
Color perception and design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of color impression using abstract and color-related semantic words and selection of suitable colors that express the word impression of these words

Keizo Shinomori, H. Takata
Journal of the Optical Society of America A
Color perception and design
article

Evaluation of color impression using abstract and color-related semantic words and selection of suitable colors that express the word impression of these words

Keizo Shinomori, H. Takata
article en

Abstract

In this study, we investigate two hypotheses for determining color impression. Color impression can be directly determined by color appearance, especially in the case of the paired comparison, or by the combination of semantic impressions defined by words [especially in the semantic differential (SD) method]. We measured the color impression of 12 chromatic colors, black, gray, and white, using seven paired semantic words related to color properties and impressions and eight paired abstract words in the SD method. We also asked 10 observers to select the appropriate colors from the 15 colors in the paired comparison method for each word. Principal component analysis was applied to the data. In the results of the SD method, the coordinates of the colors on the space of the first and second principal component axes are basically spread as the hue circle but are more clustered than in the results of the paired comparison because the semantic words at higher grading points of the SD method are similar between neighboring colors. In the results of the paired comparison, the coordinates of the colors as loading values maintained the hue circle, and the color selection rates for the words in the paired comparison showed strong correlations with one of the color properties (<i>L</i><sup>∗</sup>,<i>a</i><sup>∗</sup>,<i>b</i><sup>∗</sup>, and <i>C</i><sup>∗</sup>), except for Murky, as do the grading points for the colors in the SD method, showing that color appearance can mostly determine color impression using words directly and relatively related to colors (except Vivid and Murky), but not using some of the abstract words (such as Clean, Magnificent, and Deserted). The direct comparison between the two methods suggests that the evaluation of color-related words is not directly determined by the color appearance and color category of the stimulus colors. Instead, the color image and color impression that have already been obtained through daily life and experiences influence color impressions more in color-related words. Color evaluations using words directly and relatively related to colors in the SD method is a more complex process and can be influenced more by the interaction between the semantic meanings of the words and the color appearance. In contrast, the evaluation of the paired comparison suggests that color appearance simply and directly determines word evaluation.

Journal of the Optical Society of America AVol. 42(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Color perception and design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.