From Command-Control to Lifecycle Regulation: Balancing Innovation and Safety in China’s Pharmaceutical Legislation

<b>Background:</b> China's pharmaceutical regulatory framework is undergoing a pivotal shift from a traditional "command-control" model to a "lifecycle regulation" approach, aiming to balance drug safety, innovation, and accessibility. This study systematically examines the evolution, achievements, and challenges of China's regulatory reforms, offering insights for global pharmaceutical governance. <b>Methods:</b> Using a mixed-methods approach integrating historical analysis, policy text mining, and case studies, we reviewed the pharmaceutical laws and regulations enacted since 1949, supplemented by case studies (e.g., COVID-19 vaccine emergency approvals) and a comparative analysis with international models (e.g., U.S. FDA and EU EMA frameworks). The data were sourced from authoritative platforms such as the PKULAW database, criminal law amendments, and international regulatory texts. <b>Results:</b> China's regulatory evolution is categorized into four phases: Emergence (1949-1984), Foundational (1985-2000), Deepening Reform (2001-2018), and Lifecycle Regulation (2019-present). The revised Drug Administration Law (2019) institutionalized risk management, dynamic GMP inspections, and post-market surveillance, marking a transition to holistic lifecycle oversight. Key milestones include the introduction of the Vaccine Management Law (2019) and stricter penalties under the Criminal Law Amendment (XI) (2020). <b>Conclusions:</b> China's lifecycle regulation model demonstrates potential to harmonize safety and innovation, evidenced by improved API export compliance (e.g., 15% increase in international certifications by 2023) and accelerated approvals for breakthrough therapies (e.g., domestically developed PD-1 inhibitors). However, challenges persist, including uneven enforcement capacities, tensions between conditional approvals and risk mitigation, and reliance on global supply chains. These findings provide critical lessons for developing countries navigating similar regulatory dilemmas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13060588
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Command-Control to Lifecycle Regulation: Balancing Innovation and Safety in China’s Pharmaceutical Legislation

Shuchen Tang, Pingchang Sun, Jing Zhang
4 citations
Healthcare
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
12.52
article

From Command-Control to Lifecycle Regulation: Balancing Innovation and Safety in China’s Pharmaceutical Legislation

Shuchen Tang, Pingchang Sun, Jing Zhang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> China's pharmaceutical regulatory framework is undergoing a pivotal shift from a traditional "command-control" model to a "lifecycle regulation" approach, aiming to balance drug safety, innovation, and accessibility. This study systematically examines the evolution, achievements, and challenges of China's regulatory reforms, offering insights for global pharmaceutical governance. <b>Methods:</b> Using a mixed-methods approach integrating historical analysis, policy text mining, and case studies, we reviewed the pharmaceutical laws and regulations enacted since 1949, supplemented by case studies (e.g., COVID-19 vaccine emergency approvals) and a comparative analysis with international models (e.g., U.S. FDA and EU EMA frameworks). The data were sourced from authoritative platforms such as the PKULAW database, criminal law amendments, and international regulatory texts. <b>Results:</b> China's regulatory evolution is categorized into four phases: Emergence (1949-1984), Foundational (1985-2000), Deepening Reform (2001-2018), and Lifecycle Regulation (2019-present). The revised Drug Administration Law (2019) institutionalized risk management, dynamic GMP inspections, and post-market surveillance, marking a transition to holistic lifecycle oversight. Key milestones include the introduction of the Vaccine Management Law (2019) and stricter penalties under the Criminal Law Amendment (XI) (2020). <b>Conclusions:</b> China's lifecycle regulation model demonstrates potential to harmonize safety and innovation, evidenced by improved API export compliance (e.g., 15% increase in international certifications by 2023) and accelerated approvals for breakthrough therapies (e.g., domestically developed PD-1 inhibitors). However, challenges persist, including uneven enforcement capacities, tensions between conditional approvals and risk mitigation, and reliance on global supply chains. These findings provide critical lessons for developing countries navigating similar regulatory dilemmas.

HealthcareVol. 13(6)
Tsinghua University (CN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
12.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.