Let’s switch again! Testing for speculative oil price bubbles based on rotated market expectations

Econometric tests for bubbles suffer from mis-specified and mis-measured fundamentals. However, such tests can be carried out without using any unobservable fundamental, but relying on financial market expectations instead. We revisit the case of oil price bubbles and investigate the role of expectations. While we still find no evidence for speculative bubbles when using rotated expectations, striking differences arise regarding implied risk premia. Using raw market expectations leads to explosive risk premia which are implausible, both theoretically and empirically, while the opposite is found for rotated market expectations. • Econometric bubble testing without fundamentals. • Instead, financial market expectations are used. • No evidence in favor of a speculative oil price bubble is found. • This result remains robust for rotated expectations. • Only rotated market expectations imply non-explosive risk premia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Finance research letters
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107116
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Let’s switch again! Testing for speculative oil price bubbles based on rotated market expectations

Robinson Kruse‐Becher
3 citations
Finance research letters
Market Dynamics and Volatility
9.39
article

Let’s switch again! Testing for speculative oil price bubbles based on rotated market expectations

Robinson Kruse‐Becher
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Econometric tests for bubbles suffer from mis-specified and mis-measured fundamentals. However, such tests can be carried out without using any unobservable fundamental, but relying on financial market expectations instead. We revisit the case of oil price bubbles and investigate the role of expectations. While we still find no evidence for speculative bubbles when using rotated expectations, striking differences arise regarding implied risk premia. Using raw market expectations leads to explosive risk premia which are implausible, both theoretically and empirically, while the opposite is found for rotated market expectations. • Econometric bubble testing without fundamentals. • Instead, financial market expectations are used. • No evidence in favor of a speculative oil price bubble is found. • This result remains robust for rotated expectations. • Only rotated market expectations imply non-explosive risk premia.

Finance research lettersVol. 78
Statistical Service (CY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.