Insights into add-on effectiveness of Chinese herbal formulae in COVID-19: An overview of systematic reviews

• Chinese herbal formulae (CHF) are a widely used adjunctive in COVID-19 management. • Overview of 8 reviews (6860 patients) evaluates CHF add-on effects rigorously. • CHFs may help in reducing mortality, severity of disease and adverse events. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread worldwide, overwhelming healthcare systems. Numerous clinical trials have explored the efficacy of Chinese herbal formulae (CHFs) in treating COVID-19, resulting in a surge of systematic reviews (SRs). This review critically evaluates the additive effectiveness of CHFs for COVID-19, aiming to provide a robust foundation for high-quality research and integrated therapeutic strategies. This PRISMA-compliant review was registered on PROSPERO. We included SRs assessed oral CHFs combined with guideline recommended Standard Treatment (ST), versus ST in patients with COVID-19 patients. Primary outcomes included clinical improvement (e.g., days without ventilator support) and deterioration (e.g., new need for oxygen therapy). PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Sinomed, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP were searched from inception to July 1, 2024, for SRs (Cochrane/non-Cochrane) of RCTs reporting predefined outcomes. Secondary meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.3, with methodological quality and evidence certainty assessed via AMSTAR-II and GRADE. Eight SRs (6860 cases) were included. Meta-analyses showed that CHF combined with ST outperformed ST alone in reducing all-cause mortality (RR = 0.27, 95 %CI [0.08–0.96], P = 0.04), adverse events (RR = 0.34, 95 %CI [0.20–0.59], P < 0.0001), severe case conversion (RR = 0.33, 95 %CI [0.17–0.66], P = 0.002), and improving pulmonary imaging (RR = 1.28, 95 %CI [1.12–1.46], P = 0.0003). No significant differences were observed in clinical symptom recovery rates (cough) or recovery times (cough and fatigue). Bubble plots suggested weak to moderate effects of specific CHFs (e.g., Buzhongyiqi Decoction, Maxingshigan-Weijing Decoction ) on viral clearance, severe case conversion, adverse events, and pulmonary imaging. Comprehensive analyses indicated that CHFs showed good add-on effect in treating COVID-19. However, it is important to note that the overall quality of evidence in these studies is generally low, and further high-quality clinical trials are needed to validate these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Integrative Medicine
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102440
Primary Topic
Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insights into add-on effectiveness of Chinese herbal formulae in COVID-19: An overview of systematic reviews

Li Zheng, Huijuan Cao, Bo Li, Guodong Li et al.
European Journal of Integrative Medicine
Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds
article

Insights into add-on effectiveness of Chinese herbal formulae in COVID-19: An overview of systematic reviews

Li Zheng, Huijuan Cao, Bo Li, Guodong Li, Jiaxin Wang, Yiying Wang, Le-Yan Hu, Jie Lian, Shuai Dong
article en

Abstract

• Chinese herbal formulae (CHF) are a widely used adjunctive in COVID-19 management. • Overview of 8 reviews (6860 patients) evaluates CHF add-on effects rigorously. • CHFs may help in reducing mortality, severity of disease and adverse events. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread worldwide, overwhelming healthcare systems. Numerous clinical trials have explored the efficacy of Chinese herbal formulae (CHFs) in treating COVID-19, resulting in a surge of systematic reviews (SRs). This review critically evaluates the additive effectiveness of CHFs for COVID-19, aiming to provide a robust foundation for high-quality research and integrated therapeutic strategies. This PRISMA-compliant review was registered on PROSPERO. We included SRs assessed oral CHFs combined with guideline recommended Standard Treatment (ST), versus ST in patients with COVID-19 patients. Primary outcomes included clinical improvement (e.g., days without ventilator support) and deterioration (e.g., new need for oxygen therapy). PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Sinomed, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP were searched from inception to July 1, 2024, for SRs (Cochrane/non-Cochrane) of RCTs reporting predefined outcomes. Secondary meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.3, with methodological quality and evidence certainty assessed via AMSTAR-II and GRADE. Eight SRs (6860 cases) were included. Meta-analyses showed that CHF combined with ST outperformed ST alone in reducing all-cause mortality (RR = 0.27, 95 %CI [0.08–0.96], P = 0.04), adverse events (RR = 0.34, 95 %CI [0.20–0.59], P < 0.0001), severe case conversion (RR = 0.33, 95 %CI [0.17–0.66], P = 0.002), and improving pulmonary imaging (RR = 1.28, 95 %CI [1.12–1.46], P = 0.0003). No significant differences were observed in clinical symptom recovery rates (cough) or recovery times (cough and fatigue). Bubble plots suggested weak to moderate effects of specific CHFs (e.g., Buzhongyiqi Decoction, Maxingshigan-Weijing Decoction ) on viral clearance, severe case conversion, adverse events, and pulmonary imaging. Comprehensive analyses indicated that CHFs showed good add-on effect in treating COVID-19. However, it is important to note that the overall quality of evidence in these studies is generally low, and further high-quality clinical trials are needed to validate these findings.

European Journal of Integrative MedicineVol. 75
Xinjiang Medical University (CN), Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.