Deuterium retention in pre-lithiated samples and Li–D co-deposits in the DIII-D tokamak

Divertor designs involving liquid lithium have been proposed as an alternative to solid designs and wall conditioning techniques. However, Li affinity with tritium poses a risk for the fuel cycle. This study investigates deuterium retention in pre-lithiated samples and Li–D co-deposits in the DIII-D tokamak, making for the first time a direct comparison between Li–D co-deposits and pre-deposited Li films. Samples were exposed to H-mode plasmas in the far scrape-off layer (SOL), and Li powder was injected in-situ with the impurity powder dropper to study the uniformity of Li coatings, and the dependence of fuel retention on Li thickness. The results show that at temperatures below the melting point of lithium, deuterium retention is independent of the thickness of pre-deposited Li layers, with Li–D co-deposits being the primary factor for fuel retention. Both pre-deposited and in-situ deposited Li showed lower erosion than predicted by sputtering yield calculations. These results suggest that fuel retention in fusion reactors using lithium in the divertor will likely be dominated by co-deposits rather than in the divertor itself. If one desires to use Li to achieve flatter temperature profiles, operando Li injection is advantageous over pre-deposited Li films, at least at temperatures below the melting point of lithium. • Lithium is an attractive wall material for fusion reactors, but trapping of fuel in lithium is a potential issue. • Fuel retention in Li–D co-deposits vs. pre-deposited Li films in a tokamak • Samples were exposed to H-mode D plasmas in DIII-D and analyzed with NRA and EBS. • D retention is mainly driven by Li–D co-deposits. • D retention shows no dependence on the pre-deposited Li thickness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Materials and Energy
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nme.2025.101915
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deuterium retention in pre-lithiated samples and Li–D co-deposits in the DIII-D tokamak

Shota Abe, T.W. Morgan, A. Nagy, U. Losada et al.
1 citations
Nuclear Materials and Energy
Magnetic confinement fusion research
1.87
article

Deuterium retention in pre-lithiated samples and Li–D co-deposits in the DIII-D tokamak

Shota Abe, T.W. Morgan, A. Nagy, U. Losada, T. Abrams, F. Effenberg, Ryan Hood, Dinh Truong, D.L. Rudakov, A. Bortolon, Jun Ren, M.J. Simmonds, M. Morbey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Divertor designs involving liquid lithium have been proposed as an alternative to solid designs and wall conditioning techniques. However, Li affinity with tritium poses a risk for the fuel cycle. This study investigates deuterium retention in pre-lithiated samples and Li–D co-deposits in the DIII-D tokamak, making for the first time a direct comparison between Li–D co-deposits and pre-deposited Li films. Samples were exposed to H-mode plasmas in the far scrape-off layer (SOL), and Li powder was injected in-situ with the impurity powder dropper to study the uniformity of Li coatings, and the dependence of fuel retention on Li thickness. The results show that at temperatures below the melting point of lithium, deuterium retention is independent of the thickness of pre-deposited Li layers, with Li–D co-deposits being the primary factor for fuel retention. Both pre-deposited and in-situ deposited Li showed lower erosion than predicted by sputtering yield calculations. These results suggest that fuel retention in fusion reactors using lithium in the divertor will likely be dominated by co-deposits rather than in the divertor itself. If one desires to use Li to achieve flatter temperature profiles, operando Li injection is advantageous over pre-deposited Li films, at least at temperatures below the melting point of lithium. • Lithium is an attractive wall material for fusion reactors, but trapping of fuel in lithium is a potential issue. • Fuel retention in Li–D co-deposits vs. pre-deposited Li films in a tokamak • Samples were exposed to H-mode D plasmas in DIII-D and analyzed with NRA and EBS. • D retention is mainly driven by Li–D co-deposits. • D retention shows no dependence on the pre-deposited Li thickness.

Nuclear Materials and EnergyVol. 43
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US), Sandia National Laboratories California (US), Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (US), University of California San Diego (US), Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research (NL), General Atomics (United States) (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), Auburn University (US), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
U.S. Department of Energy, EUROfusion, European Commission, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Office of Science, Euratom Research and Training Programme, Fusion Energy Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.