Red teaming ChatGPT in medicine to yield real-world insights on model behavior

Red teaming, the practice of adversarially exposing unexpected or undesired model behaviors, is critical towards improving equity and accuracy of large language models, but non-model creator-affiliated red teaming is scant in healthcare. We convened teams of clinicians, medical and engineering students, and technical professionals (80 participants total) to stress-test models with real-world clinical cases and categorize inappropriate responses along axes of safety, privacy, hallucinations/accuracy, and bias. Six medically-trained reviewers re-analyzed prompt-response pairs and added qualitative annotations. Of 376 unique prompts (1504 responses), 20.1% were inappropriate (GPT-3.5: 25.8%; GPT-4.0: 16%; GPT-4.0 with Internet: 17.8%). Subsequently, we show the utility of our benchmark by testing GPT-4o, a model released after our event (20.4% inappropriate). 21.5% of responses appropriate with GPT-3.5 were inappropriate in updated models. We share insights for constructing red teaming prompts, and present our benchmark for iterative model assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01542-0
Citations
23
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Red teaming ChatGPT in medicine to yield real-world insights on model behavior

Benjamin H. Jacobson, Akash Chaurasia, Solveig Behr, Jesutofunmi A. Omiye et al.
23 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
15.05
article

Red teaming ChatGPT in medicine to yield real-world insights on model behavior

Benjamin H. Jacobson, Akash Chaurasia, Solveig Behr, Jesutofunmi A. Omiye, Jacob Chang, Luca Pegolotti, Irena Gao, Charbel Bou-Khalil, Juan M. Banda, Archer Y. Yang, Matthew Schwede, Roxana Daneshjou, Lü Tian, Dhamanpreet Kaur, Celeste H. Poe, Balasubramanian Narasimhan, Jason Fries, Cheng Ge, Alejandro Lozano, Rika Bajra, Alice Heiman, Angela Y. Jia, Nigam H. Shah, Allison Sihan Jia, Yuqi Tan, Tiffany Eulalio, Jonathan H. Chen, Akaash Kolluri, Eric Lin, John Tamaresis, Ye-Jean Park, Fateme Nateghi Haredasht, Sang Truong, Shawheen J. Rezaei, Chenming Zheng, Yutong Liu, Hodan Farah, Haiwen Gui, Minghe Zhang, Yanan Ding, Chandan Sanghera, Akshay Swaminathan, Diana Hla, J. Weston Jamison, Malathi Srinivasan, Binglan Li, Scott L. Fleming, Kirsten R. Steffner, Mohsen Fathzadeh, Amit Kaushal, Maniragav Manimaran, Angelica Iacovelli, Benjamin Belai, Damien Varid Kettud, Diba Dindoust, Dominik Moehrle, Joshua Lazaro, Karen Ebert Matthys, Ruhana Azam, Sonia Onyeka, Tarek Bandali, Ying Cui, Xuanyu Zhou, Minh Hoai Nguyen, Crystal Chang, Julie Lee, Sri Muppidi, Jiapeng Xu, Arpita Singhal, Rohit Khurana, Ellaine Chou, Deven Pandya, R. W. Bartlett, Arghavan Salles, Ross Duncan, Conor Messer, Jake Silberg, S. Varadha Raj, Wenyuan Chen, Qian Zhao
article en
23 citations

Abstract

Red teaming, the practice of adversarially exposing unexpected or undesired model behaviors, is critical towards improving equity and accuracy of large language models, but non-model creator-affiliated red teaming is scant in healthcare. We convened teams of clinicians, medical and engineering students, and technical professionals (80 participants total) to stress-test models with real-world clinical cases and categorize inappropriate responses along axes of safety, privacy, hallucinations/accuracy, and bias. Six medically-trained reviewers re-analyzed prompt-response pairs and added qualitative annotations. Of 376 unique prompts (1504 responses), 20.1% were inappropriate (GPT-3.5: 25.8%; GPT-4.0: 16%; GPT-4.0 with Internet: 17.8%). Subsequently, we show the utility of our benchmark by testing GPT-4o, a model released after our event (20.4% inappropriate). 21.5% of responses appropriate with GPT-3.5 were inappropriate in updated models. We share insights for constructing red teaming prompts, and present our benchmark for iterative model assessments.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
Mayo Clinic (US), Harvard University (US), Palo Alto University (US), Veterans Health Administration (US), Stanford Health Care (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Stanford Medicine (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), McGill University (CA), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
15.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.