A Comparison of Pollination Efficiency Between Wild Bumble Bees and Introduced Honey Bees on Polygonatum cyrtonema

To clarify the pollination contributions of introduced honey bees and native wild bees, we compared their pollination efficiency on a perennial herb, <i>Polygonatum cyrtonema</i> Hua. The flower's traits and bees' body traits were measured to quantify the mechanical fit between the bee species and flower. Pollen removal and deposition per visit, visit frequency, and visit duration per flower were investigated. The results show that both native bumble bees (worker bees of <i>Bombus trifasciatus</i> Smith) and introduced honey bees (<i>Apis mellifera</i> L.) are effective pollinators, but bumble bees play a more important role in pollination, due to their higher visit frequency and slightly higher pollen transfer efficiency. The bumble bees removed and deposited significantly more pollen grains per visit than the honey bees (both <i>p</i> < 0.001). The faster visiting speed and shorter visit duration of the bumble bees, combined with their larger body size and longer proboscises, may have contributed to their higher pollen transfer efficiency. The pollination success of <i>P. cyrtonema</i> depends on its pollinators. This study is the first to report on the pollination efficiency of floral visitors on <i>P. cyrtonema</i>. Our findings highlight the importance of conserving native bumble bee populations to ensure the reproductive success of <i>P. cyrtonema</i>. Future studies should focus on their management to minimize potential disruptions to native pollination contribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biology
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14030276
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Pollination Efficiency Between Wild Bumble Bees and Introduced Honey Bees on Polygonatum cyrtonema

Xiaohong Li, Yu Zhang, Jian‐Wen Shao, Ju Tang et al.
2 citations
Biology
Plant and animal studies
6.05
article

A Comparison of Pollination Efficiency Between Wild Bumble Bees and Introduced Honey Bees on Polygonatum cyrtonema

Xiaohong Li, Yu Zhang, Jian‐Wen Shao, Ju Tang, X. Ge, Yu‐Jie Xu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

To clarify the pollination contributions of introduced honey bees and native wild bees, we compared their pollination efficiency on a perennial herb, <i>Polygonatum cyrtonema</i> Hua. The flower's traits and bees' body traits were measured to quantify the mechanical fit between the bee species and flower. Pollen removal and deposition per visit, visit frequency, and visit duration per flower were investigated. The results show that both native bumble bees (worker bees of <i>Bombus trifasciatus</i> Smith) and introduced honey bees (<i>Apis mellifera</i> L.) are effective pollinators, but bumble bees play a more important role in pollination, due to their higher visit frequency and slightly higher pollen transfer efficiency. The bumble bees removed and deposited significantly more pollen grains per visit than the honey bees (both <i>p</i> < 0.001). The faster visiting speed and shorter visit duration of the bumble bees, combined with their larger body size and longer proboscises, may have contributed to their higher pollen transfer efficiency. The pollination success of <i>P. cyrtonema</i> depends on its pollinators. This study is the first to report on the pollination efficiency of floral visitors on <i>P. cyrtonema</i>. Our findings highlight the importance of conserving native bumble bee populations to ensure the reproductive success of <i>P. cyrtonema</i>. Future studies should focus on their management to minimize potential disruptions to native pollination contribution.

BiologyVol. 14(3)
Anhui Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Plant and animal studies
6.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.