On Finding Black Holes in Photometric Microlensing Surveys

Abstract There are expected to be millions of isolated black holes in the galaxy resulting from the deaths of massive stars. Measuring the abundance and properties of this remnant population would shed light on the end stages of stellar evolution and the evolution paths of black hole systems. Detecting isolated black holes is currently only possible via gravitational microlensing, which has so far yielded one definitive detection. The difficulty in finding microlensing black holes lies in having to choose a small subset of events, based on characteristics of their light curves, to allocate expensive and scarce follow-up resources to confirm the identity of the lens. Current methods either rely on simple cuts in parameter space without using the full distribution information or are only effective on small subsets of events. In this paper, we present a new lens classification method. The classifier takes in posterior constraints on light-curve parameters and combines them with a Galactic simulation to estimate the lens class probability. This method is flexible and can be used with any set of microlensing light-curve parameters, making it applicable to large samples of events. We make this classification framework available via the popclass Python package. We apply the classifier to ∼10,000 microlensing events from the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment survey and find 23 high-probability black hole candidates. Our classifier also suggests that the only known isolated black hole is an observational outlier, according to current Galactic models, and the allocation of astrometric follow-up on this event was a high-risk strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adb1d7
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Finding Black Holes in Photometric Microlensing Surveys

Natasha S. Abrams, Ming-Feng Ho, Macy Huston, Scott Perkins et al.
6 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
7.48
article

On Finding Black Holes in Photometric Microlensing Surveys

Natasha S. Abrams, Ming-Feng Ho, Macy Huston, Scott Perkins, William A. Dawson, Peter McGill, Jessica R. Lu, Z. Kaczmarek
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract There are expected to be millions of isolated black holes in the galaxy resulting from the deaths of massive stars. Measuring the abundance and properties of this remnant population would shed light on the end stages of stellar evolution and the evolution paths of black hole systems. Detecting isolated black holes is currently only possible via gravitational microlensing, which has so far yielded one definitive detection. The difficulty in finding microlensing black holes lies in having to choose a small subset of events, based on characteristics of their light curves, to allocate expensive and scarce follow-up resources to confirm the identity of the lens. Current methods either rely on simple cuts in parameter space without using the full distribution information or are only effective on small subsets of events. In this paper, we present a new lens classification method. The classifier takes in posterior constraints on light-curve parameters and combines them with a Galactic simulation to estimate the lens class probability. This method is flexible and can be used with any set of microlensing light-curve parameters, making it applicable to large samples of events. We make this classification framework available via the popclass Python package. We apply the classifier to ∼10,000 microlensing events from the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment survey and find 23 high-probability black hole candidates. Our classifier also suggests that the only known isolated black hole is an observational outlier, according to current Galactic models, and the allocation of astrometric follow-up on this event was a high-risk strategy.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 981(2)
University of California, Riverside (US), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US), Heidelberg University (DE), University of Michigan (US), Center for Theoretical Physics (PL), University of California, Berkeley (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, International Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular Microbiology, Universität Heidelberg, International Max Planck Research School for Advanced Methods in Process and Systems Engineering, Laboratory Directed Research and Development, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
7.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.