Energy, Exergy, and Environmental Impact Analysis and Optimization of Coal–Biomass Combustion Combined Cycle CHP Systems

Combined Cycle Combined Heat and Power (CCCHP) systems enhance energy efficiency and reduce emissions by simultaneously generating electricity and heat. This study presents the energy and exergy performance, environmental impact, and efficiency optimization of CCCHP combustion systems using Ebsilon Professional 16 software simulation. Three fuel combustion CCCHP systems of coal, biomass, and coal–biomass cofiring were simulated for 150 MW of total power output with 125 MW of electrical power and 25 MW of a heating energy system. The sensitivity analysis was performed for 16 different systems with the fuel moisture content varying from 10% to 40% (w/w) to identify the energy and environmental effect on simulated CCCHP systems. The simulation results indicate that increasing biomass moisture content enhanced flue gas energy and improved the Rankine cycle performance. The energy efficiency of biomass and coal–biomass combustion CCCHP systems increased from 56.90% to 67.22% and 56.94% to 62.37, with the moisture content rising from 10% to 30% (w/w) and 10% (w/w) to 25.56% (w/w), respectively, but declined beyond these. Moreover, the exergy efficiency showed a similar pattern peaking at 50.06% in biomass samples and 50.10% in the cofiring sample. Furthermore, the environmental impact, CO2 and SO2 emission concentrations reduced from 22.42% (w/w) to 20.77 (w/w) and 0.66% to 0.61%, respectively, with an increase in fuel moisture content from 10% to 25.56% in a biomass cofired combustion CCCHP system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062363
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy, Exergy, and Environmental Impact Analysis and Optimization of Coal–Biomass Combustion Combined Cycle CHP Systems

Prasad Amarasinghe, Kaveenga Rasika Koswattage, Ashan Induranga, Vimukthi Vithanage et al.
5 citations
Sustainability
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
3.37
article

Energy, Exergy, and Environmental Impact Analysis and Optimization of Coal–Biomass Combustion Combined Cycle CHP Systems

Prasad Amarasinghe, Kaveenga Rasika Koswattage, Ashan Induranga, Vimukthi Vithanage, Dasith Wijesekara
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Combined Cycle Combined Heat and Power (CCCHP) systems enhance energy efficiency and reduce emissions by simultaneously generating electricity and heat. This study presents the energy and exergy performance, environmental impact, and efficiency optimization of CCCHP combustion systems using Ebsilon Professional 16 software simulation. Three fuel combustion CCCHP systems of coal, biomass, and coal–biomass cofiring were simulated for 150 MW of total power output with 125 MW of electrical power and 25 MW of a heating energy system. The sensitivity analysis was performed for 16 different systems with the fuel moisture content varying from 10% to 40% (w/w) to identify the energy and environmental effect on simulated CCCHP systems. The simulation results indicate that increasing biomass moisture content enhanced flue gas energy and improved the Rankine cycle performance. The energy efficiency of biomass and coal–biomass combustion CCCHP systems increased from 56.90% to 67.22% and 56.94% to 62.37, with the moisture content rising from 10% to 30% (w/w) and 10% (w/w) to 25.56% (w/w), respectively, but declined beyond these. Moreover, the exergy efficiency showed a similar pattern peaking at 50.06% in biomass samples and 50.10% in the cofiring sample. Furthermore, the environmental impact, CO2 and SO2 emission concentrations reduced from 22.42% (w/w) to 20.77 (w/w) and 0.66% to 0.61%, respectively, with an increase in fuel moisture content from 10% to 25.56% in a biomass cofired combustion CCCHP system.

SustainabilityVol. 17(6)
Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka (LK)
Asian Development Bank
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
3.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.