Tegenmacht in de lokale democratie

Counter-Democracy on the Dutch local level. The aldermen’s perspective In the Dutch public and scientific debate, the concept of ‘counter-democracy’ ( tegenmacht ) plays an increasingly important role. This article explores how this concept manifest itself in the practice of Dutch local government. We focus on aldermen and explore what forms of countervailing power they encounter, to what extent these powers are effective and what lessons this provide about how counter-democratic power works in Dutch local democracy. The research is conducted through group discussions, individual interviews with (former) aldermen, and literature research. Our respondents consider counter-democracy to be of great importance, but their appreciation for the different categories varies. When they appear less manageable, such as social (and traditional) media, action groups, and to a lesser extent local courts of audit, counter-democracy can make the work of aldermen more difficult. Especially counter-democratic powers that cooperate seem to be the most effective.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Beleid en Maatschappij
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5553/benm/138900692025001
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tegenmacht in de lokale democratie

Julien van Ostaaijen, Liesbeth Collignon, Jimmy Maan, Sven Janssen
Beleid en Maatschappij
Social Media and Politics
article

Tegenmacht in de lokale democratie

Julien van Ostaaijen, Liesbeth Collignon, Jimmy Maan, Sven Janssen
article en

Abstract

Counter-Democracy on the Dutch local level. The aldermen’s perspective In the Dutch public and scientific debate, the concept of ‘counter-democracy’ ( tegenmacht ) plays an increasingly important role. This article explores how this concept manifest itself in the practice of Dutch local government. We focus on aldermen and explore what forms of countervailing power they encounter, to what extent these powers are effective and what lessons this provide about how counter-democratic power works in Dutch local democracy. The research is conducted through group discussions, individual interviews with (former) aldermen, and literature research. Our respondents consider counter-democracy to be of great importance, but their appreciation for the different categories varies. When they appear less manageable, such as social (and traditional) media, action groups, and to a lesser extent local courts of audit, counter-democracy can make the work of aldermen more difficult. Especially counter-democratic powers that cooperate seem to be the most effective.

Beleid en MaatschappijVol. 52(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tegenmacht in de lokale democratie — Julien van Ostaaijen, Liesbeth Collignon, et al. · Beleid en Maatschappij (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS