Strategies for regulating achievement emotions: Conceptualization and relations with university students’ emotions, well-being, and health

Students’ achievement emotions profoundly influence their learning, academic performance, well-being, and educational trajectories. Understanding how students regulate these emotions is crucial for their academic flourishing. We examined students’ strategies for regulating three common achievement emotions (enjoyment, anxiety, boredom), and how these strategies relate to emotions, academic well-being, health problems, and achievement-related outcomes. Our theoretical model of emotion regulation strategies is derived from the control-value theory of achievement emotions (Pekrun, 2006) and Harley et al.’s (2019) model of emotion regulation in achievement settings. It considers six groups of strategies: situation selection, social support, reappraisal, expression, suppression, and competence development. Participants included 350 (Study 1; Germany), 359 (Study 2; England), and 200 (Study 3; Germany) university students. Studies 1 and 2 were cross-sectional. Study 3 employed a five-wave prospective design and focused on course-specific achievement emotion regulation over one semester. We used a newly developed context- and emotion-specific measure of the six strategies targeting enjoyment, anxiety, and boredom (Regulation of Achievement Emotions Questionnaire, RAEQ). Strategies were linked to students’ emotions, well-being, health, and academic achievement (perceived success, Studies 1 and 2; end-of-semester test scores, Study 3) across all three studies. Furthermore, achievement emotion regulation strategies were related to, but distinct from, general emotion regulation strategies. Findings highlight the importance of students’ regulation of both positive and negative emotions, suggest that emotion regulation is context-specific, and imply that reappraisal and competence development are especially adaptive. We discuss implications for educational practice and future research. • Examines structures, use, and correlates of six emotion regulation strategies. • Considers emotion-specific strategies for regulating enjoyment, anxiety, boredom. • Presents three field studies with university students (German, English). • Regulatory strategies were closely related to emotions, well-being, and health. • Reveals reappraisal and competence development are adaptive strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Instruction
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102089
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Early Childhood Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
133.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies for regulating achievement emotions: Conceptualization and relations with university students’ emotions, well-being, and health

Reinhard Pekrun, Herbert W. Marsh, Kristina Stockinger, Markus Dresel
15 citations
Learning and Instruction
Early Childhood Education and Development
133.89
article

Strategies for regulating achievement emotions: Conceptualization and relations with university students’ emotions, well-being, and health

Reinhard Pekrun, Herbert W. Marsh, Kristina Stockinger, Markus Dresel
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Students’ achievement emotions profoundly influence their learning, academic performance, well-being, and educational trajectories. Understanding how students regulate these emotions is crucial for their academic flourishing. We examined students’ strategies for regulating three common achievement emotions (enjoyment, anxiety, boredom), and how these strategies relate to emotions, academic well-being, health problems, and achievement-related outcomes. Our theoretical model of emotion regulation strategies is derived from the control-value theory of achievement emotions (Pekrun, 2006) and Harley et al.’s (2019) model of emotion regulation in achievement settings. It considers six groups of strategies: situation selection, social support, reappraisal, expression, suppression, and competence development. Participants included 350 (Study 1; Germany), 359 (Study 2; England), and 200 (Study 3; Germany) university students. Studies 1 and 2 were cross-sectional. Study 3 employed a five-wave prospective design and focused on course-specific achievement emotion regulation over one semester. We used a newly developed context- and emotion-specific measure of the six strategies targeting enjoyment, anxiety, and boredom (Regulation of Achievement Emotions Questionnaire, RAEQ). Strategies were linked to students’ emotions, well-being, health, and academic achievement (perceived success, Studies 1 and 2; end-of-semester test scores, Study 3) across all three studies. Furthermore, achievement emotion regulation strategies were related to, but distinct from, general emotion regulation strategies. Findings highlight the importance of students’ regulation of both positive and negative emotions, suggest that emotion regulation is context-specific, and imply that reappraisal and competence development are especially adaptive. We discuss implications for educational practice and future research. • Examines structures, use, and correlates of six emotion regulation strategies. • Considers emotion-specific strategies for regulating enjoyment, anxiety, boredom. • Presents three field studies with university students (German, English). • Regulatory strategies were closely related to emotions, well-being, and health. • Reveals reappraisal and competence development are adaptive strategies.

Learning and InstructionVol. 98
University of Essex (GB), University of Augsburg (DE), University of Oxford (GB), Science Oxford (GB), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Australian Catholic University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Early Childhood Education and Development
133.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.