A critical view at the imposition of administrative punishments in simplified judicial proceedings

Relevance . The study of the judicial procedure for the imposition of administrative punishments is particularly relevant in connection with the widespread discussion in the theory of administrative law and procedure about the role of the court as an administrative jurisdiction body, rethinking the understanding of justice in administrative cases, as well as the need to optimize the court workload associated with the consideration of cases of administrative offenses. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate a critical assessment of the imposition of administrative punishments by courts in simplified judicial proceedings. Objectives . To achieve the purpose of the study, the following tasks were set: to give a general description of simplified judicial proceedings, to identify the signs of simplified judicial proceedings in cases of administrative offenses, to characterize some of the problems of implementing the procedure for imposing administrative punishments in simplified judicial proceedings, to give a critical assessment of simplified judicial proceedings in relation to the essence of the institution of administrative liability. Methodology . The methodological basis of the research includes general scientific techniques and methods of cognition, as well as special and private scientific methods, including dialectical, formal legal (dogmatic), historical, etc. Results . The study demonstrates the inconsistency of simplified judicial proceedings with the essence of the institution of administrative liability and justice in cases of bringing to public liability, as well as the inexpediency of appealing to justice to resolve the issue of imposing administrative punishments in cases currently being considered by arbitration courts in simplified proceedings. Conclusion. The author of the article puts forward the thesis about the need to abolish simplified judicial proceedings in cases of administrative offenses and transfer cases considered by arbitration courts in simplified proceedings to the jurisdiction of non-judicial public authorities by applying the criterion proposed by the author.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Southwest State University Series History and Law
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2025-15-1-39-50
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A critical view at the imposition of administrative punishments in simplified judicial proceedings

M. Yu. Stazhila
Proceedings of the Southwest State University Series History and Law
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

A critical view at the imposition of administrative punishments in simplified judicial proceedings

M. Yu. Stazhila
article en

Abstract

Relevance . The study of the judicial procedure for the imposition of administrative punishments is particularly relevant in connection with the widespread discussion in the theory of administrative law and procedure about the role of the court as an administrative jurisdiction body, rethinking the understanding of justice in administrative cases, as well as the need to optimize the court workload associated with the consideration of cases of administrative offenses. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate a critical assessment of the imposition of administrative punishments by courts in simplified judicial proceedings. Objectives . To achieve the purpose of the study, the following tasks were set: to give a general description of simplified judicial proceedings, to identify the signs of simplified judicial proceedings in cases of administrative offenses, to characterize some of the problems of implementing the procedure for imposing administrative punishments in simplified judicial proceedings, to give a critical assessment of simplified judicial proceedings in relation to the essence of the institution of administrative liability. Methodology . The methodological basis of the research includes general scientific techniques and methods of cognition, as well as special and private scientific methods, including dialectical, formal legal (dogmatic), historical, etc. Results . The study demonstrates the inconsistency of simplified judicial proceedings with the essence of the institution of administrative liability and justice in cases of bringing to public liability, as well as the inexpediency of appealing to justice to resolve the issue of imposing administrative punishments in cases currently being considered by arbitration courts in simplified proceedings. Conclusion. The author of the article puts forward the thesis about the need to abolish simplified judicial proceedings in cases of administrative offenses and transfer cases considered by arbitration courts in simplified proceedings to the jurisdiction of non-judicial public authorities by applying the criterion proposed by the author.

Proceedings of the Southwest State University Series History and LawVol. 15(1)
Russian State University of Justice (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A critical view at the imposition of administrative punishments in simplified judicial proceedings — M. Yu. Stazhila · Proceedings of the Southwest State University Series History and Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS